Educational Stakeholders' Independent Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Adaptive Learning System Using Bayesian Network Predictive Simulations

被引:24
作者
How, Meng-Leong [1 ]
Hung, Wei Loong David [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
evaluation of artificial intelligence educational systems; intelligent adaptive learning; intelligent tutoring systems; Bayesian; nonparametric data; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.3390/educsci9020110
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence-enabled adaptive learning systems (AI-ALS) are increasingly being deployed in education to enhance the learning needs of students. However, educational stakeholders are required by policy-makers to conduct an independent evaluation of the AI-ALS using a small sample size in a pilot study, before that AI-ALS can be approved for large-scale deployment. Beyond simply believing in the information provided by the AI-ALS supplier, there arises a need for educational stakeholders to independently understand the motif of the pedagogical characteristics that underlie the AI-ALS. Laudable efforts were made by researchers to engender frameworks for the evaluation of AI-ALS. Nevertheless, those highly technical techniques often require advanced mathematical knowledge or computer programming skills. There remains a dearth in the extant literature for a more intuitive way for educational stakeholders-rather than computer scientists-to carry out the independent evaluation of an AI-ALS to understand how it could provide opportunities to educe the problem-solving abilities of the students so that they can successfully learn the subject matter. This paper proffers an approach for educational stakeholders to employ Bayesian networks to simulate predictive hypothetical scenarios with controllable parameters to better inform them about the suitability of the AI-ALS for the students.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Al-Mutawah M., 2018, INT ED STUDIES, V11, P97, DOI [DOI 10.5539/IES.V11N2P97, 10.5539/ies.v11n2p97]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, RESPONSE SURFACE MET
[3]  
Bayes T., 1763, Philosophical Transactions (1683-1775), V53, P269
[4]   A Bayesian performance prediction model for mathematics education: A prototypical approach for effective group composition [J].
Bekele, Rahel ;
McPherson, Maggie .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 42 (03) :395-416
[5]  
Brusilovsky P., 2004, International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, V14, P402, DOI 10.1504/IJCEELL.2004.005729
[6]   Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience [J].
Button, Katherine S. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Mokrysz, Claire ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Flint, Jonathan ;
Robinson, Emma S. J. ;
Munafo, Marcus R. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 14 (05) :365-376
[7]  
Cen H, 2007, FRONT ARTIF INTEL AP, V158, P511
[8]   Using confirmatory factor analysis to validate the Chamberlin affective instrument for mathematical problem solving with academically advanced students [J].
Chamberlin, Scott A. ;
Moore, Alan D. ;
Parks, Kelly .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 87 (03) :422-437
[9]   Response surface methodology with prediction uncertainty: A multi-objective optimisation approach [J].
Chi, Guoyi ;
Hu, Shuangquan ;
Yang, Yanhui ;
Chen, Tao .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2012, 90 (09) :1235-1244
[10]  
Collins J. A., 1996, Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Third International Conference, ITS '96. Proceedings, P569