Comparison of the mechanisms of latency shift in pattern reversal visual evoked potential induced by blurring and contrast reduction

被引:12
作者
Tumas, V [1 ]
Sakamoto, AC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV SAO PAULO,RIBEIRAO PRETO SCH MED,DEPT NEUROL PSYCHIAT & MED PSYCHOL,BR-05508 RIBEIRAO PRET,SP,BRAZIL
来源
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1997年 / 104卷 / 01期
关键词
contrast; visual acuity; pattern reversal; visual evoked potential;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-5597(96)96123-7
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Reduction of visual acuity or of the contrast of the stimulus induces a prolongation of the pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PR-VEP) latencies, perhaps because these conditions cause deterioration of the visual capacity to recognize objects and may preferentially activate the slower central retina channel. The PR-VEP was obtained with a video stimulator and 3 kinds of stimuli: total video field, video with a central scotoma and a restricted central stimulus. The subjects were tested under conditions of normal (20/20) and reduced visual acuity (20/200) with 14' and 56' checks and 60% contrast, and under conditions of normal visual acuity (20/20) with 14/ checks and with stimulus contrast of 60% and 25%. Blurring increased latencies and decreased amplitudes only with the 14' checks stimulus but no with 56' checks, and the amplitudes obtained with the central stimulus became greater than those obtained with a central scotoma. Reducing contrast increased only latency, and there was not difference between amplitudes obtained with a central stimulus or a central scotoma. We conclude that blurring small checks induces a preferential stimulation of receptors in the central retina, but the same effect was not observed when stimulus contrast was reduced. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 100
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   INDUCED REFRACTIVE ERRORS AND PATTERN ELECTRORETINOGRAMS AND PATTERN VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIALS - IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS [J].
BARTEL, PR ;
VOS, A .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (01) :78-81
[2]   THE EFFECT OF BLUR AND CONTRAST ON VEP LATENCY - COMPARISON BETWEEN CHECK AND SINUSOIDAL GRATING PATTERNS [J].
BOBAK, P ;
BODISWOLLNER, I ;
GUILLORY, S .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 68 (04) :247-255
[3]  
BODISWOLLNER I, 1986, EVOKED POTENTIAL, P15
[4]   EVOKED-POTENTIAL TECHNIQUES IN THE EVALUATION OF VISUAL FUNCTION [J].
CELESIA, GG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 1 (01) :55-76
[5]  
Chiappa K H., 1990, Evoked potentials in clinical medicine, V2nd, P37
[6]   EFFECT OF REFRACTIVE ERROR ON THE VISUAL EVOKED-RESPONSE [J].
COLLINS, DWK ;
CARROLL, WM ;
BLACK, JL ;
WALSH, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1979, 1 (6158) :231-232
[7]  
FUCHS AF, 1989, TXB PHYSL EXCITABLE, P412
[8]  
HALLIDAY AM, 1972, LANCET, V1, P982
[9]   EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSES TO CHECKERBOARD PATTERNS . EFFECT OF CHECK-SIZE AS A FUNCTION OF VISUAL ACUITY [J].
HARTER, MR ;
WHITE, CT .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1970, 28 (01) :48-&
[10]   EFFECTS OF CONTOUR SHARPNESS AND CHECK-SIZE ON VISUALLY EVOKED CORTICAL POTENTIALS [J].
HARTER, MR ;
WHITE, CT .
VISION RESEARCH, 1968, 8 (06) :701-&