POWER AND ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ACTIVITY IN COLLEGE VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS

被引:0
作者
Aedo-Munoz, Esteban [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Tamayo Contreras, Valentin [2 ]
Rojas Reyes, Cristian [3 ]
Hernandez Wimmer, Cristian [3 ]
Brito, Ciro [4 ]
Miarka, Bianca [4 ,5 ]
Arghoty Bucheli, Rodrigo [6 ]
Dal Bello, Fabio [2 ]
Herrera Valenzuela, Tomas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Chile USACH, Fac Ciencias Med, Lab Ciencias Actividad Fis Deporte & Salud, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Santo Tomas UST, Fac Salud, Escuela Ciencias Deporte & Actividad Fis, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ Metropolitana Ciencias Educ UMCE, Dept Educ Fis Deportes & Recreac, Nunoa, Chile
[4] Univ Fed Juiz de Fora UFJF, Programa Posgrad Educ Fis, Juiz De Fora, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro UFRJ, Programa Posgrad Educ Fis, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[6] Escuela Mil Cadetes Jose Maria Cordova, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
surface electromyography; power; vertical jump; volleyball; PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; OUTPUT; FORCE;
D O I
10.15517/pensarmov.v18i1.37753
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the relative power of lower limbs and the surface electromyographic activity (EMG) of the gluteus maximus (GM), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), and lateral gastrocnemius (GASLAT) during a countermovement jump (CMJ) and an Abalakov jump (ABK). Twenty-four college volleyball players were divided into two equal groups assigned by division: Group 1 (G1), comprised of volleyball players from the 1st university division, and Group 2 (G2), comprised of volleyball players from the 2nd university division. Both groups took two simultaneous EMG and power assessments. For the power assessment, a 2D recording system was used to track the greater trochanter with a 250fps camera. The video was analyzed with the Tracker 4.96 software to obtain absolute power values. The EMG activity was measured using a Delsys Trigno (R) electromyograph in the GM, VM, VL, and GASLAT muscles. Significant differences were found in %Peak(RMS) of VL (G(1)=65.2 square 10.2; G(2)=54.0 +/- 11.7 %Peak(RMS); p<0.05) for CMJ, as well as in VL (G(1)=69.6 +/- 17.3; G(2)=55.1 +/- 12.3 %Peak(RMS); p<0.05) for ABK and GASLAT (G(1)=61.4 +/- 13.4; G(2)=50.6 +/- 7.2 %Peak(RMS); p<0.05). Regarding relative power, no significant differences were present between CMJ (p> 0.05) and ABK (p>0.05).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Aedo-Munoz E., 2020, PENSAR MOVIMIENTO RE, V18, DOI [10.15517/pensarmov.v18i1.42436, DOI 10.15517/PENSARMOV.V18I1.42436]
  • [2] Bosco C., 1984, VALORACION FUERZA CO
  • [3] Evaluation of power prediction equations: Peak vertical jumping power in women
    Canavan, PK
    Vescovi, JD
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (09) : 1589 - 1593
  • [4] Chu D. A., 2013, PLYOMETRICS ESTADOS
  • [5] Developing Maximal Neuromuscular Power Part 1-Biological Basis of Maximal Power Production
    Cormie, Prue
    McGuigan, Michael R.
    Newton, Robert U.
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 41 (01) : 17 - 38
  • [6] Criswell E., 2011, CRAMS INTRO SURFACE, V2nd
  • [7] Mechanical and neural function of triceps surae in elite racewalking
    Cronin, Neil J.
    Hanley, Brian
    Bissas, Athanassios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 121 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [8] DalBello F., 2017, 35 C INT BIOM SPORT
  • [9] EFFECT OF PLYOMETRIC TRAINING ON EXPLOSIVE STRENGTH IN TEAM SPORTS: A META-ANALYSIS
    Denis Alfaro-Jimenez
    Salicetti-Fonseca, Alejandro
    Jimenez-Diaz, Judith
    [J]. PENSAR EN MOVIMIENTO-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS DEL EJERCICIO Y LA SALUD, 2018, 16 (01)
  • [10] EVALUATION OF PLYOMETRIC INTENSITY USING ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
    Ebben, William P.
    Simenz, Christopher
    Jensen, Randall L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2008, 22 (03) : 861 - 868