Inter-examiner reliability of a classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain

被引:65
作者
Fersum, K. Vibe [1 ]
O'Sullivan, P. B. [2 ]
Kvale, A. [1 ]
Skouen, J. S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Hlth Care, Sect Physiotherapy Sci, N-5018 Bergen, Norway
[2] Curtin Univ Technol, Sch Physiotherapy, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[3] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Outpatient Spine Clin, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
关键词
Agreement; Classification; Low back pain; Reliability; PELVIC GIRDLE PAIN; STABILIZING EXERCISE; PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION; THERAPY; DISORDERS; DIAGNOSIS; IMPAIRMENT; SUBACUTE; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.math.2008.08.003
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
There is a lack of studies examining whether mechanism-based classification systems (CS) acknowledging biological, psychological and social dimensions of long-lasting low back pain (LBP) disorders can be performed in a reliable manner. The purpose of this paper was to examine the inter-tester reliability of clinicians' ability to independently classify patients with non-specific LBP (NSLBP), utilising a mechanism-based classification method. Twenty-six patients with NSLBP underwent an interview and full physical examination by four different physiotherapists. Percentage agreement and Kappa coefficients were calculated for six different levels of decision making. For levels 1-4, percentage agreement had a mean of 96% (range 75-100%). For the primary direction of provocation Kappa and percentage agreement had a mean between the four testers of 0.82 (range 0.66-0.90) and 86% (range 73-92%) respectively. At the final decision making level, the scores for detecting psychosocial influence gave a mean Kappa coefficient of 0.65 (range 0.57-0.74) and 87% (range 85-92%). The findings suggest that the inter-tester reliability of the system is moderate to substantial for a range of patients within the NSLBP population in line with previous research. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 561
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA
  • [2] [Anonymous], MUSC PHYS AUSTR 13 B
  • [3] Bogduk N, 1995, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V18, P603
  • [4] A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain
    Cherkin, DC
    Deyo, RA
    Battié, M
    Street, J
    Barlow, W
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (15) : 1021 - 1029
  • [5] Differences in sitting postures are associated with nonspecific chronic low back pain disorders when patients are subclassified
    Dankaerts, W
    O'Sullivan, P
    Burnett, A
    Straker, LM
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (06) : 698 - 704
  • [6] The inter-examiner reliability of a classification method for non-specific chronic low back pain patients with motor control impairment
    Dankaerts, W
    O'Sullivan, PB
    Straker, LM
    Burnett, AF
    Skouen, JS
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2006, 11 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [7] A TREATMENT-BASED CLASSIFICATION APPROACH TO LOW-BACK SYNDROME - IDENTIFYING AND STAGING PATIENTS FOR CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT
    DELITTO, A
    ERHARD, RE
    BOWLING, R
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 75 (06): : 470 - 485
  • [8] CENTRALIZATION PHENOMENON - ITS USEFULNESS IN EVALUATING AND TREATING REFERRED PAIN
    DONELSON, R
    SILVA, G
    MURPHY, K
    [J]. SPINE, 1990, 15 (03) : 211 - 213
  • [9] Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: A randomized trial
    Ferreira, Manuela L.
    Ferreira, Paulo H.
    Latimer, Jane
    Herbert, Robert D.
    Hodges, Paul W.
    Jennings, Matthew D.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    [J]. PAIN, 2007, 131 (1-2) : 31 - 37
  • [10] Fritz JM, 2003, SPINE, V28, P1363