Public Participation in the Development Process of a Mobility Assistance System for Visually Impaired Pedestrians

被引:5
作者
Weinberger, Nora [1 ]
Winkelmann, Markus [1 ]
Mueller, Karin [2 ]
Ritterbusch, Sebastian [3 ,4 ]
Stiefelhagen, Rainer [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Technol Assessment & Syst Anal, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Study Ctr Visually Impaired, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] iXpoint Informat Syst GmbH, Pforzheimer Str 160, D-76275 Ettlingen, Germany
[4] VWA Hsch Berufsbegleitendes Studium, Wolframstr 32, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany
[5] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Comp Vis Human Comp Interact Lab, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
grand challenge; people with visual impairments; technology assessment; demand-orientation; public participation; co-design;
D O I
10.3390/soc9020032
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Blind and visually impaired people have to cope with the safe movement through public space and the (lack of) knowledge of spatial issues and walkable routes. These challenges often lead to a fear of accidents and collisions, frequently also of disorientation. This, in turn, can result in a reduced radius of action, restricted mobility, and later on, in social isolation. Against this background, the project TERRAIN aims at developing a technical guidance system for orientation and navigation in urban space. For the development of this assistance system, the project pursues an approach in which reflexive, responsive, and deliberative dimensions have been integrated to address the ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) in a co-design process. This paper focuses on the participation of citizens independent of vision impairments in the project which provided a variety of relevant indications of impacts and potential technical adaptations from an outer' point of view. In addition, conclusions can be drawn about the existing desirability and acceptance of the technical solution among the potential users as well as their social environment of potential users. In addition, it turned out that the citizen participation process raised different expectations among the project partners. Therefore, this article evaluates the participation results from the perspective of the technology developers and the technology assessors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-531-18939-0_38, DOI 10.1007/978-3-531-18939-0]
[2]   Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bourne, Rupert R. A. ;
Flaxman, Seth R. ;
Braithwaite, Tasanee ;
Cicinelli, Maria V. ;
Das, Aditi ;
Jonas, Jost B. ;
Keeffe, Jill ;
Kempen, John H. ;
Leasher, Janet ;
Limburg, Hans ;
Naidoo, Kovin ;
Pesudovs, Konrad ;
Resnikoff, Serge ;
Silvester, Alex ;
Stevens, Gretchen A. ;
Tahhan, Nina ;
Wong, Tien Y. ;
Taylor, Hugh R. .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2017, 5 (09) :E888-E897
[4]  
Clark-Carter D., 1983, VISUALLY HANDICAPPED
[5]  
Grunwald A., 2010, Technikfolgenabschatzung-eine Einfuhrung, V2nd
[6]   Assigning meaning to NEST by technology futures: extended responsibility of technology assessment in RRI [J].
Grunwald, Armin .
JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2017, 4 (02) :100-117
[7]  
Hellstrm T., 2003, Technol. Soc, V25, P369, DOI [10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1, DOI 10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1]
[8]  
Kunz Aline, 2016, JMIR Hum Factors, V3, pe25
[9]  
Manduchi R., 2011, INSIGHT RES PRACTICE, V4, P44
[10]  
Mayring P., 2000, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, V1, DOI 10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089