Informed Consent for Exome Sequencing Research in Families with Genetic Disease: The Emerging Issue of Incidental Findings

被引:29
|
作者
Bergner, Amanda L. [1 ]
Bollinger, Juli [2 ]
Raraigh, Karen S. [1 ]
Tichnell, Crystal [3 ]
Murray, Brittney [3 ]
Blout, Carrie Lynn [1 ]
Telegrafi, Aida Bytyci [1 ]
James, Cynthia A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, McKusick Nathans Inst Genet Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Genet & Publ Policy Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
exome sequencing; genome sequencing; informed consent; incidental findings; genetic counseling; genetic testing; UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM; CLINICAL EXOME; GENOMICS; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.a.36706
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genomic sequencing technology is increasingly used in genetic research. Studies of informed consent for exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) research have largely involved hypothetical scenarios or healthy individuals enrolling in population-based studies. Studies have yet to explore the consent experiences of adults with inherited disease. We conducted a qualitative interview study of 15 adults recently enrolled in a large-scale ES/GS study (11 affected adults, four parents of affected children). Our study had two goals: (1) to explore three theoretical barriers to consent for ES/GS research (interpretive/technical complexity, possibility of incidental findings, and risks of loss of privacy); and (2) to explore how interviewees experienced the consent process. Interviewees could articulate study goals and processes, describe incidental findings, discuss risks of privacy loss, and reflect on their consent experience. Few expected the study would identify the genetic cause of their condition. All elected to receive incidental findings. Interviewees acknowledged paying little attention to potential implications of incidental findings in light of more pressing goals of supporting research regarding their own medical conditions. Interviewees suggested that experience living with a genetic condition prepared them to adjust to incidental findings. Interviewees also expressed little concern about loss of confidentiality of study data. Some experienced the consent process as very long. None desired reconsent prior to return of study results. Families with inherited disease likely would benefit from a consent process in which study risks and benefits were discussed in the context of prior experiences with genetic research and genetic disease. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2745 / 2752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exome sequencing a review of new strategies for rare genomic disease research
    Brown, Tony L.
    Meloche, Theresa M.
    GENOMICS, 2016, 108 (3-4) : 109 - 114
  • [42] Clinical and psychological implications of secondary and incidental findings in cancer susceptibility genes after exome sequencing in patients with rare disorders
    Carrasco, Estela
    Lopez-Fernandez, Adria
    Codina-Sola, Marta
    Valenzuela, Irene
    Cueto-Gonzalez, Am
    Villacampa, Guillermo
    Navarro, Victor
    Torres-Esquius, Sara
    Palau, Dolors
    Cruellas, Mara
    Torres, Maite
    Perez-Duenas, Belen
    Abuli, Anna
    Diez, Orland
    Sabado-Alvarez, Constantino
    Garcia-Arumi, Elena
    Tizzano, Eduardo F.
    Moreno, Lucas
    Balmana, Judith
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2023, 60 (07) : 685 - 691
  • [43] RESEARCHER PERSPECTIVES ON DISCLOSURE OF INCIDENTAL FINDINGS IN GENETIC RESEARCH
    Meacham, Meredith C.
    Starks, Helene
    Burke, Wylie
    Edwards, Kelly
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2010, 5 (03) : 31 - 41
  • [44] Reflecting on Earlier Experiences with Unsolicited Findings: Points to Consider for Next-Generation Sequencing and Informed Consent in Diagnostics
    Rigter, Tessel
    Henneman, Lidewij
    Kristoffersson, Ulf
    Hall, Alison
    Yntema, Helger G.
    Borry, Pascal
    Tonnies, Holger
    Waisfisz, Quinten
    Elting, Mariet W.
    Dondorp, Wybo J.
    Cornel, Martina C.
    HUMAN MUTATION, 2013, 34 (10) : 1322 - 1328
  • [45] Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases
    Kleiderman, Erika
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Fernandez, Conrad V.
    Boycott, Kym M.
    Ouellette, Gail
    Wong-Rieger, Durhane
    Adam, Shelin
    Richer, Julie
    Avard, Denise
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2014, 40 (10) : 691 - 696
  • [46] Informed Consent: An Ethical Issue in Conducting Research with Male Partner Violent Offenders
    Crane, Cory A.
    Hawes, Samuel W.
    Mandel, Dolores
    Easton, Caroline J.
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2013, 23 (06) : 477 - 488
  • [47] THE ADEQUACY OF INFORMED CONSENT FORMS IN GENETIC RESEARCH IN OMAN: A PILOT STUDY
    Al-Riyami, Asya
    Jaju, Deepali
    Jaju, Sanjay
    Silverman, Henry J.
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2011, 11 (02) : 57 - 62
  • [48] Exome and Genome Sequencing and Parallels in Radiology: Searching for Patient-Centered Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings
    Kang, Stella K.
    Spector-Bagdady, Kayte
    Caplan, Arthur L.
    Braithwaite, R. Scott
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (12) : 1467 - 1472
  • [49] Content Analysis of Informed Consent for Whole Genome Sequencing Offered by Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies
    Niemiec, Emilia
    Borry, Pascal
    Pinxten, Wim
    Howard, Heidi Carmen
    HUMAN MUTATION, 2016, 37 (12) : 1248 - 1256
  • [50] Return of non-ACMG recommended incidental genetic findings to pediatric patients: considerations and opportunities from experiences in genomic sequencing
    Bowling, Kevin M.
    Thompson, Michelle L.
    Kelly, Melissa A.
    Scollon, Sarah
    Slavotinek, Anne M.
    Powell, Bradford C.
    Kirmse, Brian M.
    Hendon, Laura G.
    Brothers, Kyle B.
    Korf, Bruce R.
    Cooper, Gregory M.
    Greally, John M.
    Hurst, Anna C. E.
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2022, 14 (01)