Informed Consent for Exome Sequencing Research in Families with Genetic Disease: The Emerging Issue of Incidental Findings

被引:29
|
作者
Bergner, Amanda L. [1 ]
Bollinger, Juli [2 ]
Raraigh, Karen S. [1 ]
Tichnell, Crystal [3 ]
Murray, Brittney [3 ]
Blout, Carrie Lynn [1 ]
Telegrafi, Aida Bytyci [1 ]
James, Cynthia A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, McKusick Nathans Inst Genet Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Genet & Publ Policy Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
exome sequencing; genome sequencing; informed consent; incidental findings; genetic counseling; genetic testing; UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM; CLINICAL EXOME; GENOMICS; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.a.36706
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genomic sequencing technology is increasingly used in genetic research. Studies of informed consent for exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) research have largely involved hypothetical scenarios or healthy individuals enrolling in population-based studies. Studies have yet to explore the consent experiences of adults with inherited disease. We conducted a qualitative interview study of 15 adults recently enrolled in a large-scale ES/GS study (11 affected adults, four parents of affected children). Our study had two goals: (1) to explore three theoretical barriers to consent for ES/GS research (interpretive/technical complexity, possibility of incidental findings, and risks of loss of privacy); and (2) to explore how interviewees experienced the consent process. Interviewees could articulate study goals and processes, describe incidental findings, discuss risks of privacy loss, and reflect on their consent experience. Few expected the study would identify the genetic cause of their condition. All elected to receive incidental findings. Interviewees acknowledged paying little attention to potential implications of incidental findings in light of more pressing goals of supporting research regarding their own medical conditions. Interviewees suggested that experience living with a genetic condition prepared them to adjust to incidental findings. Interviewees also expressed little concern about loss of confidentiality of study data. Some experienced the consent process as very long. None desired reconsent prior to return of study results. Families with inherited disease likely would benefit from a consent process in which study risks and benefits were discussed in the context of prior experiences with genetic research and genetic disease. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2745 / 2752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tailoring the process of informed consent in genetic and genomic research
    Rotimi, Charles N.
    Marshall, Patricia A.
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2010, 2
  • [32] Informed Consent Form Challenges for Genetic Research in a Developing Arab Country with High Risk for Genetic Disease
    Nair, Satish Chandrasekhar
    Ibrahim, Halah
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2015, 24 (02) : 294 - 299
  • [33] Development of clinical decision support alerts for pharmacogenomic incidental findings from exome sequencing
    Nishimura, Adam A.
    Shirts, Brian H.
    Dorschner, Michael O.
    Amendola, Laura M.
    Smith, Joe W.
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (11) : 939 - 942
  • [34] Criteria for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome sequencing - a focus group study on professional practices and perspectives in Belgian genetic centres
    Saelaert, Marlies
    Mertes, Heidi
    Moerenhout, Tania
    De Baere, Elfride
    Devisch, Ignaas
    BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS, 2019, 12 (01)
  • [35] Criteria for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome sequencing – a focus group study on professional practices and perspectives in Belgian genetic centres
    Marlies Saelaert
    Heidi Mertes
    Tania Moerenhout
    Elfride De Baere
    Ignaas Devisch
    BMC Medical Genomics, 12
  • [36] Exome sequencing study in a clinical research setting finds general acceptance of study returning secondary genomic findings with little decisional conflict
    Similuk, Morgan N.
    Yan, Jia
    Setzer, Michael R.
    Jamal, Leila
    Littel, Patricia
    Lenardo, Michael
    Su, Helen C.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (03) : 766 - 773
  • [37] Oncologists' and cancer patients' views on whole-exome sequencing and incidental findings: results from the CanSeq study
    Gray, Stacy W.
    Park, Elyse R.
    Najita, Julie
    Martins, Yolanda
    Traeger, Lara
    Bair, Elizabeth
    Gagne, Joshua
    Garber, Judy
    Janne, Pasi A.
    Lindeman, Neal
    Lowenstein, Carol
    Oliver, Nelly
    Sholl, Lynette
    Van Allen, Eliezer M.
    Wagle, Nikhil
    Wood, Sam
    Garraway, Levi
    Joffe, Steven
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (10) : 1011 - 1019
  • [38] Genetic diagnosis of autoinflammatory disease patients using clinical exome sequencing
    Batlle-Maso, Laura
    Mensa-Vilaro, Anna
    Solis-Moruno, Manuel
    Marques-Bonet, Tomas
    Arostegui, Juan I.
    Casals, Ferran
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2020, 63 (05)
  • [39] Genetic Diagnosis in Consanguineous Families With Kidney Disease by Homozygosity Mapping Coupled With Whole-Exome Sequencing
    Al-Romaih, Khaldoun I.
    Genovese, Giulio
    Al-Mojalli, Hamad
    Al-Othman, Saleh
    Al-Manea, Hadeel
    Al-Suleiman, Mohammed
    Al-Jondubi, Mohammed
    Atallah, Nourah
    Al-Rodayyan, Maha
    Weins, Astrid
    Pollak, Martin R.
    Adra, Chaker N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2011, 58 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [40] Patients' Views on Identifiability of Samples and Informed Consent for Genetic Research
    Hull, Sara Chandros
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Botkin, Jeffrey R.
    Brown, Mark
    Hughes, Mark
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    Schwinn, Debra
    Sankar, Pamela
    Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana
    Clarridge, Brian R.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    Katz, Treuman
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2008, 8 (10) : 62 - 70