Informed Consent for Exome Sequencing Research in Families with Genetic Disease: The Emerging Issue of Incidental Findings

被引:29
|
作者
Bergner, Amanda L. [1 ]
Bollinger, Juli [2 ]
Raraigh, Karen S. [1 ]
Tichnell, Crystal [3 ]
Murray, Brittney [3 ]
Blout, Carrie Lynn [1 ]
Telegrafi, Aida Bytyci [1 ]
James, Cynthia A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, McKusick Nathans Inst Genet Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Genet & Publ Policy Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
exome sequencing; genome sequencing; informed consent; incidental findings; genetic counseling; genetic testing; UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM; CLINICAL EXOME; GENOMICS; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.a.36706
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genomic sequencing technology is increasingly used in genetic research. Studies of informed consent for exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) research have largely involved hypothetical scenarios or healthy individuals enrolling in population-based studies. Studies have yet to explore the consent experiences of adults with inherited disease. We conducted a qualitative interview study of 15 adults recently enrolled in a large-scale ES/GS study (11 affected adults, four parents of affected children). Our study had two goals: (1) to explore three theoretical barriers to consent for ES/GS research (interpretive/technical complexity, possibility of incidental findings, and risks of loss of privacy); and (2) to explore how interviewees experienced the consent process. Interviewees could articulate study goals and processes, describe incidental findings, discuss risks of privacy loss, and reflect on their consent experience. Few expected the study would identify the genetic cause of their condition. All elected to receive incidental findings. Interviewees acknowledged paying little attention to potential implications of incidental findings in light of more pressing goals of supporting research regarding their own medical conditions. Interviewees suggested that experience living with a genetic condition prepared them to adjust to incidental findings. Interviewees also expressed little concern about loss of confidentiality of study data. Some experienced the consent process as very long. None desired reconsent prior to return of study results. Families with inherited disease likely would benefit from a consent process in which study risks and benefits were discussed in the context of prior experiences with genetic research and genetic disease. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2745 / 2752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
    Green, Robert C.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Grody, Wayne W.
    Kalia, Sarah S.
    Korf, Bruce R.
    Martin, Christa L.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Nussbaum, Robert L.
    O'Daniel, Julianne M.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    Watson, Michael S.
    Williams, Marc S.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (07) : 565 - 574
  • [22] Whole Exome Sequencing in South Africa: Stakeholder Views on Return of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings
    Van der Merwe, Nicole
    Ramesar, Raj
    De Vries, Jantina
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [23] Factors complicating the informed consent process for whole exome sequencing in neonatal and pediatic intensive care units
    Diamonstein, Callie J.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2019, 28 (02) : 256 - 262
  • [24] Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing
    Allyse, Megan
    Michie, Marsha
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (08) : 439 - 441
  • [25] The implications of familial incidental findings from exome sequencing: the NIH Undiagnosed Diseases Program experience
    Lawrence, Lauren
    Sincan, Murat
    Markel, Thomas
    Adams, David R.
    Gill, Fred
    Godfrey, Rena
    Golas, Gretchen
    Groden, Catherine
    Landis, Dennis
    Nehrebecky, Michele
    Park, Grace
    Soldatos, Ariane
    Tifft, Cynthia
    Toro, Camilo
    Wahl, Colleen
    Wolfe, Lynne
    Gahl, William A.
    Boerkoel, Cornelius F.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 16 (10) : 741 - 750
  • [26] Expanded carrier screening for inherited genetic disease using exome and genome sequencing
    Belnap, N.
    Ramsey, K.
    Abraham, A.
    Ryan, A.
    Rangasamy, S.
    Bonfitto, A.
    Naymik, M.
    Huentelman, M.
    Strom, S.
    Perry, D.
    Subramaniam, A.
    Grody, W. W.
    Szelinger, S.
    Narayanan, V.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2025, 34 (02)
  • [27] Readability of informed consent forms for whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing
    Niemiec E.
    Vears D.F.
    Borry P.
    Howard H.C.
    Journal of Community Genetics, 2018, 9 (2) : 143 - 151
  • [28] Reporting Incidental Findings in Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing: Incorporation of the 2013 ACMG Recommendations into Current Practices of Genetic Counseling
    Smith, Lacey A.
    Douglas, Jessica
    Braxton, Alicia A.
    Kramer, Kate
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2015, 24 (04) : 654 - 662
  • [29] Analysis of state laws on informed consent for clinical genetic testing in the era of genomic sequencing
    Spector-Bagdady, Kayte
    Prince, Anya E. R.
    Yu, Joon-Ho
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS, 2018, 178 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [30] Minimizing liability risks under the ACMG recommendations for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
    Evans, Barbara J.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (12) : 915 - 920