Midterm results of transventricular mitral valve repair: Single-center experience

Objective: The study objective was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of transventricular mitral valve repair and its association with the initial anatomy of the mitral valve. Methods: This nonrandomized observational study included 88 patients (mean age, 60 years; 69% were men) who underwent transventricular mitral valve repair for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation between 2011 and 2017. Mitral valve function was assessed by echocardiography at 1 and 6 months and annually after the procedure. According to the location of mitral valve pathology, all patients were stratified into 4 anatomic types (A, B, C, and D). Results were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method, mixed-effects continuation ratio model, and multivariable Cox regression. Results: Median follow-up of 42 months (interquartile range, 27-55) was complete for 83 patients (94.3%). There were 3 late deaths: 2 cardiac and 1 noncardiac. Recurrent mitral regurgitation greater than 2thorn was observed in 29 patients (33%), and 18 patients (20.5%) underwent repeat surgery. Device success was 82% in type A at 6 months and thereafter; 87%, 85%, and 75% at 6, 12, and 36 months in type B, respectively; and 53% at 1 month and 20% at 24 months in type C. Probability of postoperative mitral regurgitation progression was higher in patients with greater preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, type B pathology, and type C pathology (P<.05). Risk factors of mitral regurgitation recurrence included increased left ventricle size (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.20; P = .001) and type C pathology (hazard ratio, 5.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-19.21; P = .003). Conclusions: Initial acceptable mitral regurgitation reduction after transventricular mitral valve repair of isolated P2 prolapse was possible but found durable in only 82% at 3 years. Higher risk of mitral regurgitation recurrence occurred with complex degenerative pathology.