Investigating the Consistency of Uncalibrated Multispectral Lidar Vegetation Indices at Different Altitudes

被引:8
作者
Okhrimenko, Maxim [1 ,2 ]
Hopkinson, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lethbridge, Dept Geog, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada
[2] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Math Problems Biol RAS, MV Keldysh Inst Appl Math, 1 Prof Vitkevich St, Pushchino 142290, Moscow Region, Russia
基金
加拿大创新基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
multispectral lidar; radiometry; intensity; forest canopy; active spectral vegetation indices; NDVI; lidar point density; Teledyne Optech Titan; LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION; AIRBORNE LIDAR; LEAF MOISTURE; INTENSITY; CALIBRATION; FORM; REFLECTANCE; GROWTH; STAND; ANGLE;
D O I
10.3390/rs11131531
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Multi-spectral (ms) airborne light detection and ranging (lidar) data are increasingly used for mapping purposes. Geometric data are enriched by intensity digital numbers (DNs) and, by utilizing this additional information either directly, or in the form of active spectral vegetation indices (SVIs), enhancements in land cover classification and change monitoring are possible. In the case of SVIs, the indices should be calculated from reflectance values derived from intensity DNs after rigorous calibration. In practice, such calibration is often not possible, and SVIs calculated from intensity DNs are used. However, the consistency of such active ms lidar products is poorly understood. In this study, the authors reported on an ms lidar mission at three different altitudes above ground to investigate SVI consistency. The stability of two families of indices-spectral ratios and normalized differences-was compared. The need for atmospheric correction in case of considerable range difference was established. It was demonstrated that by selecting single returns (provided sufficient point density), it was possible to derive stable SVI products. Finally, a criterion was proposed for comparing different lidar acquisitions over vegetated areas.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1977, GEOMETRICAL CONSIDER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, REMOTE SENSING IMAGE
[3]   Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas [J].
Baltsavias, EP .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 54 (2-3) :199-214
[4]   POTENTIALS AND LIMITS OF VEGETATION INDEXES FOR LAI AND APAR ASSESSMENT [J].
BARET, F ;
GUYOT, G .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 35 (2-3) :161-173
[5]  
Budei BC, 2018, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V204, P632, DOI [10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.037, 10.1016]
[6]   Using Multitemporal and Multispectral Airborne Lidar to Assess Depth of Peat Loss and Correspondence With a New Active Normalized Burn Ratio for Wildfires [J].
Chasmer, L. E. ;
Hopkinson, C. D. ;
Petrone, R. M. ;
Sitar, M. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (23) :11851-11859
[7]  
Deering DW, 1974, MONITORING VEGETATIO, P351
[8]   Remote sensing of species mixtures in conifer plantations using LiDAR height and intensity data [J].
Donoghue, Daniel N. M. ;
Watt, Peter J. ;
Cox, Nicholas J. ;
Wilson, Jimmy .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 110 (04) :509-522
[9]   Capability Assessment and Performance Metrics for the Titan Multispectral Mapping Lidar [J].
Fernandez-Diaz, Juan Carlos ;
Carter, William E. ;
Glennie, Craig ;
Shrestha, Ramesh L. ;
Pan, Zhigang ;
Ekhtari, Nima ;
Singhania, Abhinav ;
Hauser, Darren ;
Sartori, Michael .
REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (11)
[10]   The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels [J].
Gamon, JA ;
Serrano, L ;
Surfus, JS .
OECOLOGIA, 1997, 112 (04) :492-501