Wind response control of building with variable stiffness tuned mass damper using empirical mode decomposition/Hilbert transform

被引:146
作者
Varadarajan, N [1 ]
Nagarajaiah, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
wind loads; damping; structural control; stiffness; buildings; high-rise; Australia;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(451)
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of a novel semiactive variable stiffness-tuned mass damper (SAIVS-TMD) for the response control of a wind-excited tall benchmark building is investigated in this study. The benchmark building considered is a proposed 76-story concrete office tower in Melbourne, Australia. It is a slender building 306 m tall with a height to width ratio of 7.3; hence, it is wind sensitive. Across wind load data from wind tunnel tests are used in the present study.The objective of this study is to evaluate the new SAIVS-TMD system, that has the distinct advantage of continuously retuning its frequency due to real time control and is robust to changes in building stiffness and damping. In comparison, the passive tuned mass damper (TMD) can only be tuned to a fixed frequency. A time varying analytical model of the tall building with the SAIVS-TMD is developed. The frenquency of the SAIVS-TMD is achieved based on empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert transform instantaneious fr6qpency algorithm developed by the writers. It is shown thafthe SAIVS-TMD can reduce the structural response substantially, when compared to the uncontrolled case, and it can reduce the response, further when compared to the case with TMD. Additionally, it is shown the SAIVS-TMD reduces response even when the building stiffness changes by +/- 15% and is robust; whereas, the TMD loses its effectiveness under such building stiffness variations. It is also shown that SAIVS-TMD can reduce the response similar to an active TMD, however, with an order of magnitude less power consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 458
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Abe M, 1996, J SOUND VIB, V198, P547
[2]   DYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS AND SOME DESIGN FORMULAS [J].
ABE, M ;
FUJINO, Y .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1994, 23 (08) :813-835
[3]   A new approach to shock isolation and vibration suppression using a resetable actuator [J].
Bobrow, JE ;
Jabbari, F ;
Thai, K .
JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (03) :570-573
[4]  
Cohen L., 1995, TIME FREQUENCY ANAL
[5]  
den Hartog J.P., 1947, MECH VIBRATIONS
[6]   Design method for high-force electrorheological dampers [J].
Gavin, HP .
SMART MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 1998, 7 (05) :664-673
[7]  
HAUNG EN, 1998, P ROY SOC LOND A MAT, V454, P903
[8]   SEMI-ACTIVE VERSUS PASSIVE OR ACTIVE TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR STRUCTURAL CONTROL [J].
HROVAT, D ;
BARAK, P ;
RABINS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1983, 109 (03) :691-705
[9]   A UNIFIED MODE-COMBINATION THEORY FOR STATIONARY RESPONSE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS [J].
IGUSA, T .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1992, 21 (02) :109-126
[10]   Active mass driver system as the first application of active structural control [J].
Ikeda, Y ;
Sasaki, K ;
Sakamoto, M ;
Kobori, T .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2001, 30 (11) :1575-1595