The milestone for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis using novel simplified predictive scoring system: a propensity score analysis

被引:19
作者
Chiba, Masafumi [1 ]
Kato, Masayuki [1 ]
Kinoshita, Yuji [2 ]
Shimamoto, Nana [1 ]
Tomita, Youichi [2 ]
Abe, Takahiro [1 ]
Kanazawa, Keisuke [1 ]
Tsukinaga, Shintaro [1 ]
Nakano, Masanori [2 ]
Torisu, Yuichi [2 ]
Toyoizumi, Hirobumi [1 ]
Sumiyama, Kazuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Dept Endoscopy, Sch Med, Minato Ku, 3-25-8 Nishi Shimbashi, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
[2] Jikei Univ, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 12期
关键词
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP); Predictive scoring system; Propensity score analysis; Internal validation; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; NAFAMOSTAT MESILATE; RISK-FACTORS; MANAGEMENT; EVENTS; MODEL; COMPLICATIONS; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-08173-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) with trans-papillary approach remains a major issue, and the multi-factorial etiology can lead to the development of unpredictable PEP. Therefore, the early identification of PEP is highly desirable to assist with the health cost containment, the reduction in unnecessary admissions, earlier appropriate primary care, and intensive care for preventing progression of severe pancreatitis. This study aimed to establish a simplified predictive scoring system for PEP. Methods Between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019, 3362 consecutive trans-papillary ERCP procedures were retrospectively analyzed. Significant risk factors were extracted by univariate, multivariate, and propensity score analyses, and the probability of PEP in the combinations of each factor were quantified using propensity score analysis. The results were internally validated using bootstrapping resampling. Results In the scoring system with four stratifications using combinations of only five extracted risk factors, the very high-risk group showed 28.79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.30%-41.25%; P < 0.001) in the predicted incidence rate of PEP, and 9.09% (95% CI, 3.41%-18.74%; P < 0.001) in that of severe PEP; although the adjusted prevalence revealed 3.74% in PEP and 0.90% in severe PEP, respectively. The prediction model had an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89) and the optimism-corrected model as an internal validation had an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.86). Conclusions We established and validated a simplified predictive scoring system for PEP using five risk factors immediately after ERCP to assist with the early identification of PEP.
引用
收藏
页码:6696 / 6707
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (01) :119-151
[2]   Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus [J].
Banks, Peter A. ;
Bollen, Thomas L. ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Gooszen, Hein G. ;
Johnson, Colin D. ;
Sarr, Michael G. ;
Tsiotos, Gregory G. ;
Vege, Santhi Swaroop .
GUT, 2013, 62 (01) :102-111
[3]   Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders [J].
Cepeda, MS ;
Boston, R ;
Farrar, JT ;
Strom, BL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 158 (03) :280-287
[4]   Adverse events associated with ERCP [J].
Chandrasekhara, Vinay ;
Khashab, Mouen A. ;
Muthusamy, V. Raman ;
Acosta, Ruben D. ;
Agrawal, Deepak ;
Bruining, David H. ;
Eloubeidi, Mohamad A. ;
Fanelli, Robert D. ;
Faulx, Ashley L. ;
Gurudu, Suryakanth R. ;
Kothari, Shivangi ;
Lightdale, Jenifer R. ;
Qumseya, Bashar J. ;
Shaukat, Aasma ;
Wang, Amy ;
Wani, Sachin B. ;
Yang, Julie ;
DeWitt, John M. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (01) :32-47
[5]  
Collins GS, 2015, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V68, P112, DOI [10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1111/eci.12376, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025]
[6]   Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Admission After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography [J].
Cote, Gregory A. ;
Lynch, Sheryl ;
Easler, Jeffery J. ;
Keen, Alyson ;
Vassell, Patricia A. ;
Sherman, Stuart ;
Hui, Siu ;
Xu, Huiping .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 13 (13) :2323-+
[7]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[8]   Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ding, Xiang ;
Zhang, FuCheng ;
Wang, YaoJun .
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2015, 13 (04) :218-229
[9]   UNITED-STATES HOUSEHOLDER SURVEY OF FUNCTIONAL GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS - PREVALENCE, SOCIODEMOGRAPHY, AND HEALTH IMPACT [J].
DROSSMAN, DA ;
LI, ZM ;
ANDRUZZI, E ;
TEMPLE, RD ;
TALLEY, NJ ;
THOMPSON, WG ;
WHITEHEAD, WE ;
JANSSENS, J ;
FUNCHJENSEN, P ;
CORAZZIARI, E ;
RICHTER, JE ;
KOCH, GG .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1993, 38 (09) :1569-1580
[10]   ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline [J].
Dumonceau, Jean-Marc ;
Kapral, Christine ;
Aabakken, Lars ;
Papanikolaou, Ioannis S. ;
Tringali, Andrea ;
Vanbiervliet, Geoffroy ;
Beyna, Torsten ;
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario ;
Hritz, Istvan ;
Mariani, Alberto ;
Paspatis, Gregorios ;
Radaelli, Franco ;
Lakhtakia, Sundeep ;
Veitch, Andrew M. ;
van Hooft, Jeanin E. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 52 (02) :127-149