fiddle: a tool to combat publication bias by getting research out of the file drawer and into the scientific community

被引:9
作者
Bernard, Rene [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Weissgerber, Tracey L. [5 ]
Bobrov, Evgeny [5 ]
Winham, Stacey J. [6 ]
Dirnagl, Ulrich [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Riedel, Nico [5 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, NeuroCure Cluster Excellence, Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[4] Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[5] QUEST Ctr Transforming Biomed Res, BIH, Berlin, Germany
[6] Mayo Clin Rochester, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1042/CS20201125
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Statistically significant findings are more likely to be published than non-significant or null findings, leaving scientists and healthcare personnel to make decisions based on distorted scientific evidence. Continuously expanding 'file drawers' of unpublished data from well-designed experiments waste resources creates problems for researchers, the scientific community and the public. There is limited awareness of the negative impact that publication bias and selective reporting have on the scientific literature. Alternative publication formats have recently been introduced that make it easier to publish research that is difficult to publish in traditional peer reviewed journals. These include micropublications, data repositories, data journals, preprints, publishing platforms, and journals focusing on null or neutral results. While these alternative formats have the potential to reduce publication bias, many scientists are unaware that these formats exist and don't know how to use them. Our open source file drawer data liberation effort (fiddle) tool (RRID:SCR 017327 available at: http://s-quest.bihealth.org/fiddle/) is a match-making Shiny app designed to help biomedical researchers to identify the most appropriate publication format for their data. Users can search for a publication format that meets their needs, compare and contrast different publication formats, and find links to publishing platforms. This tool will assist scientists in getting otherwise inaccessible, hidden data out of the file drawer into the scientific community and literature. We briefly highlight essential details that should be included to ensure reporting quality, which will allow others to use and benefit from research published in these new formats.
引用
收藏
页码:2729 / 2739
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints
    Abdill, Richard J.
    Blekhman, Ran
    [J]. ELIFE, 2019, 8
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, CLIN TRIAL REGISTRAT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, NIH PEER REV
  • [4] Bruckner T., 2017, CLIN TRIAL TRANSPARE
  • [5] Chang W., 2018, SHINY WEB APPL FRAME
  • [6] 'Spin' in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review
    Chiu, Kellia
    Grundy, Quinn
    Bero, Lisa
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2017, 15 (09)
  • [7] Colavizza G., 2019, CITATION ADVANTAGE L
  • [8] Publishing priorities of biomedical research funders
    Collins, Ellen
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (10):
  • [9] Publication bias in animal research presented at the 2008 Society of Critical Care Medicine Conference
    Conradi U.
    Joffe A.R.
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 10 (1)
  • [10] Registering clinical trials
    Dickersin, K
    Rennie, D
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (04): : 516 - 523