Product Attribute Function Deployment (PAFD) for Decision-Based Conceptual Design

被引:27
作者
Hoyle, Christopher J. [1 ]
Chen, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Conceptual design; decision-based design (DBD); product attribute function deployment (PAFD); quality function deployment (QFD); target setting; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; SELECTION; FUZZY; QFD; REQUIREMENTS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2008.927787
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The critical product planning phase, early in the product development cycle, requires a design tool to establish engineering priorities, select the preferred design concept, and set target levels of engineering performance while considering the needs of both the consumer and producer. The quality function deployment (QFD) method was developed as a design process tool to translate customer needs into engineering characteristics; however, limitations have been identified in using the QFD method for product planning. In this paper, a new design tool called product attribute function deployment (PAFD), based on the principles of decision-based design (DBD), is introduced as a decision-theoretic, enterprise-level process tool to guide the conceptual design phase. The PAFD method extends the qualitative matrix principles of QFD while utilizing the quantitative decision-making processes of DBD. The PAFD method is built upon established methods in engineering, marketing, and decision analysis to eliminate the need for the user ratings and rankings of performance, priority, and attribute coupling in the QFD method. The differences between the QFD and the PAFD processes are compared and contrasted, and the conceptual design of an automotive manifold absolute pressure sensor is used as a case study to demonstrate the features and benefits of the PAFD method.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 284
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Al'tshuller G., 1988, Creativity as an exact science. The theory of the solution of inventive problems
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, Decision making in engineering design
  • [3] [Anonymous], PRINCIPLES DESIGN
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, Bayesian statistics and marketing
  • [5] AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD - AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION
    ARMACOST, RL
    COMPONATION, PJ
    MULLENS, MA
    SWART, WW
    [J]. IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1994, 26 (04) : 72 - 79
  • [6] The virtual integrated design method
    Aungst, Stan
    Barton, Russell
    Wilson, David
    [J]. Quality Engineering, 2003, 15 (04) : 565 - 579
  • [7] Ben-Akiva M.E., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand, V9
  • [8] BRACKIN P, 1999, 1999 ASME DES ENG TE
  • [9] AN INTELLIGENT REAL-TIME DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR COMPONENT SELECTION - AN APPROACH TO MANAGING UNCERTAINTY
    BRADLEY, SR
    AGOGINO, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1994, 116 (04) : 980 - 988
  • [10] Quality function deployment: A literature review
    Chan, LK
    Wu, ML
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 143 (03) : 463 - 497