THE ENFORCEABILITY OF ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN TRUSTS

被引:6
作者
Conaglen, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Equ & Trusts, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
trusts; arbitration; arbitrability; public policy; repugnancy; inherent jurisdiction; arbitration agreement; REPUGNANCY; DOCTRINE; LAW;
D O I
10.1017/S0008197315000653
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article considers the enforceability of arbitration clauses which are included in trust documentation. It focuses on two main questions. The first is whether internal trust disputes are capable of being settled by arbitration. The article offers arguments in favour of the arbitrability of such disputes. It then addresses the question of whether parties to an internal trust dispute can be forced to arbitrate, rather than litigate, where the trust documentation contains an arbitration clause. It is argued that there are real difficulties in the argument that such clauses can be enforced as arbitration agreements, under the ordinary arbitration statutes, but that the court could potentially enforce such a clause under its inherent jurisdiction to control its proceedings.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 479
页数:30
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]  
Jones W., 1967, ELIZABETHAN COURT CH, P273
[22]  
Le Poidevin N., 2012, T T, V18, P309
[23]   Arbitration and trusts: can it be done? [J].
Le Poidevin, Nicholas .
TRUSTS & TRUSTEES, 2012, 18 (04) :307-315
[24]  
Matthews Paul., 2006, Law Q Rev, V122, P266
[25]  
Monro C., 1847, ACTA CANCELLARICE, P540
[26]  
Mustill M.J., 1989, COMMERCIAL ARBITRATI, P433
[27]  
New Zealand Law Commission, 2013, 130 NZ LAW COMM, V130, pR42
[28]  
Story J., 1886, COMMENTARIES EQUITY, V2, P793
[29]  
Strong S., 2012, VANDERBILT J TRANS L, V45, P1205
[30]  
Thomas G., 2013, HALSBURYS LAWS ENGLA, V98, P652