Comparative analysis of wall shear stress models to the drift-flux model applied to slug flow regime

被引:3
作者
Lima, L. E. M. [1 ]
Rosa, E. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Technol Univ Parana, Mech Acad Dept, BR-84016210 Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Fac Mech Engn, BR-13083860 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
gas-liquid; slug flow; wall shear stress; fluid mechanics; mathematical modeling; drift-flux model; FRICTIONAL PRESSURE-DROP; GAS-LIQUID FLOW; 2-PHASE FLOW; FREQUENCY; HOLDUP; TRANSITIONS; PREDICTION; SUSPENSION; VELOCITY; MOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2014.07.032
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The one-dimensional drift-flux model efficiently predicts gas-liquid flows dominated by gravity force. The advantages of the drift-flux model applied to pipe flows are the absence of interfacial terms, well posedness and the reduced number of transport equations, but its weakness lays on the constitutive laws to predict the wall shear force of a gas-liquid mixture. Its success on upward vertical slug flows is, in part, due to the fact that for gravity dominated flows the friction contribution to the pressure gradient is usually small. In these applications the accuracy of the wall shear force model is not dominant. A challenging aspect is the application of the drift-flux model to the horizontal slug flows where the pressure gradient is due to friction force. The objective of this work is to develop a comparative analysis among wall shear stress models applied to the one-dimensional, steady state drift-flux approach applied to gas-liquid mixture flowing in the slug regime. Effective viscosity models based on the homogeneous and also on empirical propositions are employed. Additionally it is also introduced a mechanistic wall shear stress model. The effect of the use of distinct wall shear models into the drift-flux model is assessed by comparing the estimated pressure gradients against experimental data. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 383
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], APPL MATH SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], TECHNICAL REPORT
[3]   HOLDUP OF THE LIQUID SLUG IN 2 PHASE INTERMITTENT FLOW [J].
BARNEA, D ;
BRAUNER, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 1985, 11 (01) :43-49
[4]   EFFECT OF BROWNIAN-MOTION ON BULK STRESS IN A SUSPENSION OF SPHERICAL-PARTICLES [J].
BATCHELOR, GK .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1977, 83 (NOV) :97-117
[5]   A SIMPLE 2-PHASE FRICTIONAL PRESSURE-DROP CALCULATION METHOD [J].
BEATTIE, DRH ;
WHALLEY, PB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 1982, 8 (01) :83-87
[6]  
Bueno L.G.G., 2010, THESIS STATE U CAMPI
[7]   MODEL FOR GAS-LIQUID SLUG FLOW IN HORIZONTAL AND NEAR HORIZONTAL TUBES [J].
DUKLER, AE ;
HUBBARD, MG .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY FUNDAMENTALS, 1975, 14 (04) :337-347
[8]   FRICTIONAL PRESSURE DROP IN 2-PHASE FLOW .B. AN APPROACH THROUGH SIMILARITY ANALYSIS [J].
DUKLER, AE ;
WICKS, M ;
CLEVELAND, RG .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1964, 10 (01) :44-51
[9]   A new determination of the molecular dimensions [J].
Einstein, A .
ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, 1906, 19 (02) :289-306
[10]   ON VISCOSITY OF A CONCENTRATED SUSPENSION OF SOLID SPHERES [J].
FRANKEL, NA ;
ACRIVOS, A .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1967, 22 (06) :847-&