Systemic Metronidazole May Not Reduce Posthemorrhoidectomy Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:1
作者
Wanis, Kerollos Nashat [1 ]
Emmerton-Coughlin, Heather M. [1 ]
Coughlin, Shaun [1 ]
Foley, Norine [2 ]
Vinden, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Surg, London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Analgesia; Hemorrhoidectomy; Meta-analysis; Metronidazole; Systematic review; POST-HEMORRHOIDECTOMY PAIN; DOUBLE-BLIND; TOPICAL METRONIDAZOLE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; BUPIVACAINE; ANALGESIA; BLOCK;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000000792
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhoidectomy is associated with significant postoperative pain. Oral metronidazole has been recommended as an adjunct to improve posthemorrhoidectomy analgesia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of oral metronidazole on patient-reported pain following hemorrhoidectomy. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic search in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials examining adults who underwent surgical hemorrhoidectomy were included. Participants in an active intervention group received oral metronidazole postoperatively, and those in a control group received placebo or usual care. Postoperative pain was assessed for at least 3 days postoperatively. INTERVENTION: A random-effects model was used. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcome was pain during the first 2 postoperative weeks, measured on a visual analogue scale. The secondary outcome was time to return to normal activities. RESULTS: Patients who received oral metronidazole had significantly lower reported pain scores on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference, -0.87 +/- 0.44; 95% CI, -1.73 to -0.015; p = 0.046; n = 4) and day 4 (standardized mean difference, -1.43 +/- 0.71; 95% CI, -2.83 to -0.037; p = 0.044; n = 3). Metronidazole use was associated with a significantly shorter time to return to normal activities (standardized mean difference, -0.76 +/- 0.34; 95% CI, -1.43 to -0.088, p = 0.027). The improvements disappeared in a sensitivity analysis excluding the largest trial with a high risk of bias, and no significance was observed during the remaining postoperative days. LIMITATIONS: The meta-analysis was limited by lack of double blinding, absence of a placebo, and unclear or high risk of bias in a proportion of the included trials. CONCLUSIONS: Although a favorable adverse effect profile supports consideration of oral metronidazole to reduce posthemorrhoidectomy pain, pooled analysis reveals inconsistent results with no pain reduction on most postoperative days. The current recommendation for routine prescription of oral metronidazole should be reevaluated in the absence of additional well-designed trials.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 455
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of palliative care for pain among Chinese adults with cancer
    Zhao, Xin-Xin
    Cui, Meng
    Geng, Yi-Hang
    Yang, Yi-Long
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 18 (01)
  • [42] Topical analgesia following excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Xia, Weisi
    Park, Brittany
    Otutaha, Bacil F.
    MacFater, Wiremu S.
    MacCormick, Andrew D.
    Sammour, Tarik
    Hill, Andrew G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 35 (02) : 181 - 197
  • [43] Systemic antifungal therapy for oesophageal candidiasis - systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mwassi, Heyam Atamna
    Yahav, Dafna
    Ayada, Gida
    Matsri, Sher
    Margalit, Ili
    Shargian, Liat
    Bishara, Jihad
    Atamna, Alaa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2022, 59 (06)
  • [44] Perioperative Single Dose Systemic Dexamethasone for Postoperative Pain A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    De Oliveira, Gildasio S., Jr.
    Almeida, Marcela D.
    Benzon, Honorio T.
    McCarthy, Robert J.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 115 (03) : 575 - 588
  • [45] The Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Postoperative Pain Control in Breast Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chen, I-Chun
    Kang, Yi-No
    Wang, Hsian-Jenn
    Chiu, Wen-Kuan
    Chen, Chiehfeng
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 46 (03) : 1106 - 1115
  • [46] Exercise for Fibromyalgia Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ramel, Judith
    Bannuru, Raveendhara
    Griffith, Marcie
    Wang, Chenchen
    [J]. CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REVIEWS, 2009, 5 (04) : 188 - 193
  • [47] Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) for Postcraniotomy Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ghaffarpasand, Fariborz
    Dadgostar, Ehsan
    Ilami, Ghazal
    Shoaee, Fatemeh
    Niakan, Amin
    Aghabaklou, Sara
    Ghadimi, Maryam
    Goudarzi, Sogand
    Dehghankhalili, Maryam
    Alavi, Mohammad Hesam
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 134 : 569 - 576
  • [48] Effect of aromatherapy on postoperative pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Peijia
    Liao, Xin
    Yuan, Qi
    Lyu, Fengqiong
    Xie, Shenghua
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 62
  • [49] Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Vigneault, Louise
    Turgeon, Alexis F.
    Cote, Dany
    Lauzier, Francois
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Moore, Lynne
    McIntyre, Lauralyn A.
    Nicole, Pierre C.
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2011, 58 (01): : 22 - 37
  • [50] Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kohlert, Antonia
    Wick, Katharina
    Rosendahl, Jenny
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 29 (05) : 531 - 542