Simulated-annealing-based conditional simulation for the local-scale characterization of heterogeneous aquifers

被引:31
作者
Dafflon, B. [1 ]
Irving, J. [1 ]
Holliger, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Inst Geophys, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Data integration; Georadar; Simulated annealing; Stochastic methods; Porosity; Conditional simulation; GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; TOMOGRAPHY; SITE; INVERSION; BOREHOLE; INTEGRATION; TRANSPORT; RESERVOIR; GEORADAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.09.010
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Simulated-annealing-based conditional simulations provide a flexible means of quantitatively integrating diverse types of subsurface data. Although such techniques are being increasingly used in hydrocarbon reservoir characterization studies, their potential in environmental, engineering and hydrological investigations is still largely unexploited. Here, we introduce a novel simulated annealing (SA) algorithm geared towards the integration of high-resolution geophysical and hydrological data which, compared to more conventional approaches, provides significant advancements in the way that large-scale structural information in the geophysical data is accounted for. Model perturbations in the annealing procedure are made by drawing from a probability distribution for the target parameter conditioned to the geophysical data. This is the only place where geophysical information is utilized in our algorithm, which is in marked contrast to other approaches where model perturbations are made through the swapping of values in the simulation grid and agreement with soft data is enforced through a correlation coefficient constraint. Another major feature of our algorithm is the way in which available geostatistical information is utilized. Instead of constraining realizations to match a parametric target covariance model over a wide range of spatial lags, we constrain the realizations only at smaller lags where the available geophysical data cannot provide enough information. Thus we allow the larger-scale subsurface features resolved by the geophysical data to have much more due control on the output realizations. Further, since the only component of the SA objective function required in our approach is a covariance constraint at small lags, our method has improved convergence and computational efficiency over more traditional methods. Here, we present the results of applying our algorithm to the integration of porosity log and tomographic crosshole georadar data to generate stochastic realizations of the local-scale porosity structure. Our procedure is first tested on a synthetic data set, and then applied to data collected at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 70
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, PHYS PROPERTIES ROCK
[2]   Seismic reservoir mapping from 3-D AVO in a North Sea turbidite system [J].
Avseth, P ;
Mukerji, T ;
Jorstad, A ;
Mavko, G ;
Veggeland, T .
GEOPHYSICS, 2001, 66 (04) :1157-1176
[3]   Joint estimation of porosity and saturation using stochastic rock-physics modeling [J].
Bachrach, Ran .
GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 71 (05) :O53-O63
[4]   Hierarchical geostatistics and multifacies systems: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Boise, Idaho [J].
Barrash, W ;
Clemo, T .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2002, 38 (10)
[5]  
BARRASH W, 1998, C HAZ WAST RES GREAT
[6]   Lithologic tomography: From plural geophysical data to lithology estimation [J].
Bosch, M .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1999, 104 (B1) :749-766
[7]  
Caers Jef., 2001, The Leading Edge, V20, P308, DOI DOI 10.1190/1.1438936
[8]   Estimating the hydraulic conductivity at the South Oyster Site from geophysical tomographic data using Bayesian techniques based on the normal linear regression model [J].
Chen, JS ;
Hubbard, S ;
Rubin, Y .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (06) :1603-1613
[9]  
CLEMENT WP, 1999, GEOPH SURV BOIS HYDR
[10]   GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION MAPPING OF SOIL AND ROCK STRATIGRAPHY [J].
DAVIS, JL ;
ANNAN, AP .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1989, 37 (05) :531-551