Reward-Based Transfer From Bottom-Up to Top-Down Search Tasks

被引:60
作者
Lee, Jeongmi [1 ]
Shomstein, Sarah [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Mind & Brain, Davis, CA 95618 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, Washington, DC 20052 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
attention; rewards; visual search; VISUAL SALIENCE MAP; PARIETAL CORTEX; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; SELECTION; PRIORITY; BEHAVIOR; TARGETS;
D O I
10.1177/0956797613509284
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent evidence has suggested that reward modulates bottom-up and top-down attentional selection and that this effect persists within the same task even when reward is no longer offered. It remains unclear whether reward effects transfer across tasks, especially those engaging different modes of attention. We directly investigated whether reward-based contingency learned in a bottom-up search task was transferred to a subsequent top-down search task, and probed the nature of the transfer mechanism. Results showed that a reward-related benefit established in a pop-out-search task was transferred to a conjunction-search task, increasing participants' efficiency at searching for targets previously associated with a higher level of reward. Reward history influenced search efficiency by enhancing both target salience and distractor filtering, depending on whether the target and distractors shared a critical feature. These results provide evidence for reward-based transfer between different modes of attention and strongly suggest that an integrated priority map based on reward information guides both top-down and bottom-up attention.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 475
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Laurent, Patryk A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11)
[2]   Value-driven attentional capture [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Laurent, Patryk A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (25) :10367-10371
[3]   Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy [J].
Awh, Edward ;
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) :437-443
[4]   Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain [J].
Corbetta, M ;
Shulman, GL .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) :201-215
[5]  
Della Libera C, 2006, PSYCHOL SCI, V17, P222
[6]   Learning to Attend and to Ignore Is a Matter of Gains and Losses [J].
Della Libera, Chiara ;
Chelazzi, Leonardo .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (06) :778-784
[7]   Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection [J].
Fecteau, Jillian H. ;
Munoz, Douglas. P. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (08) :382-390
[8]   INVOLUNTARY COVERT ORIENTING IS CONTINGENT ON ATTENTIONAL CONTROL SETTINGS [J].
FOLK, CL ;
REMINGTON, RW ;
JOHNSTON, JC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (04) :1030-1044
[9]   Saccades, salience and attention: the role of the lateral intraparietal area in visual behavior [J].
Goldberg, Michael E. ;
Bisley, James W. ;
Powell, Keith D. ;
Gottlieb, Jacqueline .
VISUAL PERCEPTION, PT 2: FUNDAMENTALS OF AWARENESS: MULTI-SENSORY INTEGRATION AND HIGH-ORDER PERCEPTION, 2006, 155 :157-175
[10]   From thought to action: The parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition [J].
Gottlieb, Jacqueline .
NEURON, 2007, 53 (01) :9-16