An adaptive paradigm for detecting the individual duration of the preparatory period in the choice reaction time task

被引:3
作者
Soghoyan, Gurgen [1 ]
Aksiotis, Vladislav [1 ]
Rusinova, Anna [1 ]
Myachykov, Andriy [2 ,3 ]
Tumyalis, Alexey [1 ]
机构
[1] Higher Sch Econ Univ, Ctr Bioelect Interfaces, Inst Cognit Neurosci, Moscow, Russia
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Psychol, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Higher Sch Econ Univ, Ctr Cognit & Decis Making, Inst Cognit Neurosci, Moscow, Russia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 09期
关键词
TEMPORAL EXPECTANCY EVIDENCE; FOREPERIOD; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; ACTIVATION; SPEED;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0273234
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
According to the sequential stage model, the selection and the execution of a motor response are two distinct independent processes. Here, we propose a new adaptive paradigm for identifying the individual duration of the response preparatory period based on the motor reaction time (RT) data. The results are compared using the paradigm with constant values of the preparatory period. Two groups of participants performed on either an easy (Group 1) or a hard (Group 2) response selection task with two types of stimuli based on the preparatory period parameters: (1) stimuli with a constant preparatory period duration of 0 or 1200 ms and (2) stimuli with adaptive preparatory period durations. Our analysis showed an increase in the duration of the response selection process as a function of increasing task complexity when using both paradigms with constant and adaptive values of the preparatory period duration. We conclude that the adaptive paradigm proposed in the current paper has several important advantages over the constant paradigm in terms of measuring the response accuracy while being equally efficiently in capturing other critical response parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Qualitative speed-accuracy tradeoff effects that cannot be explained by the diffusion model under the selective influence assumption
    Rafiei, Farshad
    Rahnev, Dobromir
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [22] The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks
    Ratcliff, Roger
    McKoon, Gail
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2008, 20 (04) : 873 - 922
  • [23] Performance of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on a test battery of impulsiveness
    Rubia, Katya
    Smith, Anna
    Taylor, Eric
    [J]. CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 13 (03) : 276 - 304
  • [24] An Integrated Theory of Deciding and Acting
    Servant, Mathieu
    Logan, Gordon D.
    Gajdos, Thibault
    Evans, Nathan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2021, 150 (12) : 2435 - 2454
  • [25] Evidence for distinct steps in response preparation from a delayed response paradigm
    Shin, Yun Kyoung
    Proctor, Robert W.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 191 : 42 - 51
  • [26] Parsing a cognitive task: A characterization of the mind's bottleneck
    Sigman, M
    Dehaene, S
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2005, 3 (02) : 334 - 349
  • [27] Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them
    Sternberg, S
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2001, 106 (1-2) : 147 - 246
  • [28] A Two-Stage Process Model of Sensory Discrimination: An Alternative to Drift-Diffusion
    Sun, Peng
    Landy, Michael S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 36 (44) : 11259 - 11274
  • [29] How does temporal preparation speed up response implementation in choice tasks? Evidence for an early cortical activation
    Tandonnet, Christophe
    Davranche, Karen
    Meynier, Chloe
    Burle, Boris
    Vidal, Franck
    Hasbroucq, Thierry
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 (02) : 252 - 260
  • [30] The specificity of temporal expectancy: Evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm
    Thomaschke, Roland
    Wagener, Annika
    Kiesel, Andrea
    Hoffmann, Joachim
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (12) : 2289 - 2300