An adaptive paradigm for detecting the individual duration of the preparatory period in the choice reaction time task

被引:3
作者
Soghoyan, Gurgen [1 ]
Aksiotis, Vladislav [1 ]
Rusinova, Anna [1 ]
Myachykov, Andriy [2 ,3 ]
Tumyalis, Alexey [1 ]
机构
[1] Higher Sch Econ Univ, Ctr Bioelect Interfaces, Inst Cognit Neurosci, Moscow, Russia
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Psychol, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Higher Sch Econ Univ, Ctr Cognit & Decis Making, Inst Cognit Neurosci, Moscow, Russia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 09期
关键词
TEMPORAL EXPECTANCY EVIDENCE; FOREPERIOD; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; ACTIVATION; SPEED;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0273234
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
According to the sequential stage model, the selection and the execution of a motor response are two distinct independent processes. Here, we propose a new adaptive paradigm for identifying the individual duration of the response preparatory period based on the motor reaction time (RT) data. The results are compared using the paradigm with constant values of the preparatory period. Two groups of participants performed on either an easy (Group 1) or a hard (Group 2) response selection task with two types of stimuli based on the preparatory period parameters: (1) stimuli with a constant preparatory period duration of 0 or 1200 ms and (2) stimuli with adaptive preparatory period durations. Our analysis showed an increase in the duration of the response selection process as a function of increasing task complexity when using both paradigms with constant and adaptive values of the preparatory period duration. We conclude that the adaptive paradigm proposed in the current paper has several important advantages over the constant paradigm in terms of measuring the response accuracy while being equally efficiently in capturing other critical response parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation
    Brown, Scott D.
    Heathcote, Andrew
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 57 (03) : 153 - 178
  • [2] Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors
    Cheyne, J. Allan
    Solman, Grayden J. F.
    Carriere, Jonathan S. A.
    Smilek, Daniel
    [J]. COGNITION, 2009, 111 (01) : 98 - 113
  • [3] Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Top-Down Cognitive Control
    Dalley, Jeffrey W.
    Everitt, Barry J.
    Robbins, Trevor W.
    [J]. NEURON, 2011, 69 (04) : 680 - 694
  • [4] A Two-Stage Diffusion Modeling Approach to the Compelled-Response Task
    Diederich, Adele
    Colonius, Hans
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 128 (04) : 787 - 802
  • [5] Evidence for Two Concurrent Inhibitory Mechanisms during Response Preparation
    Duque, Julie
    Lew, David
    Mazzocchio, Riccardo
    Olivier, Etienne
    Ivry, Richard B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (10) : 3793 - 3802
  • [6] Inhibitory processes for critical situations - the role of n-2 task repetition costs in human multitasking situations
    Gade, Miriam
    Koch, Iring
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 3
  • [7] Independence of Movement Preparation and Movement Initiation
    Haith, Adrian M.
    Pakpoor, Jina
    Krakauer, John W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 36 (10) : 3007 - 3015
  • [8] Hommel B, 2000, CONTROL OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES: ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE XVIII, P247
  • [9] Motor programming during practice conditions high and low in contextual interference
    Immink, MA
    Wright, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (02) : 423 - 437
  • [10] Contextual interference: A response planning account
    Immink, MA
    Wright, DL
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (04): : 735 - 754