Non-adjacent Dependency Learning in Humans and Other Animals

被引:60
作者
Wilson, Benjamin [1 ]
Spierings, Michelle [2 ]
Ravignani, Andrea [3 ,4 ]
Mueller, Jutta L. [5 ]
Mintz, Toben H. [6 ,7 ]
Wijnen, Frank [8 ]
van der Kant, Anne [9 ]
Smith, Kenny [10 ]
Rey, Arnaud [11 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Neurosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Vienna, Dept Cognit Biol, Vienna, Austria
[3] Sealctr Pieterburen, Res Dept, Pieterburen, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Brussel, Artificial Intelligence Lab, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Osnabrueck, Inst Cognit Sci, Osnabruck, Germany
[6] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[7] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Linguist, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[8] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Linguist OTS, Utrecht, Netherlands
[9] Univ Potsdam, Dept Linguist, Potsdam, Germany
[10] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Language Evolut, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[11] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Marseille, France
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
Non‐ adjacent dependency; Artificial grammar; Structured sequence processing; Human; Infant; Nonhuman animal; Primate;
D O I
10.1111/tops.12381
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Learning and processing natural language requires the ability to track syntactic relationships between words and phrases in a sentence, which are often separated by intervening material. These nonadjacent dependencies can be studied using artificial grammar learning paradigms and structured sequence processing tasks. These approaches have been used to demonstrate that human adults, infants and some nonhuman animals are able to detect and learn dependencies between nonadjacent elements within a sequence. However, learning nonadjacent dependencies appears to be more cognitively demanding than detecting dependencies between adjacent elements, and only occurs in certain circumstances. In this review, we discuss different types of nonadjacent dependencies in language and in artificial grammar learning experiments, and how these differences might impact learning. We summarize different types of perceptual cues that facilitate learning, by highlighting the relationship between dependent elements bringing them closer together either physically, attentionally, or perceptually. Finally, we review artificial grammar learning experiments in human adults, infants, and nonhuman animals, and discuss how similarities and differences observed across these groups can provide insights into how language is learned across development and how these language-related abilities might have evolved.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 858
页数:16
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants [J].
Aslin, RN ;
Saffran, JR ;
Newport, EL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (04) :321-324
[2]  
Bach E., 1986, Language and Cognitive Processes, V1, P249, DOI 10.1080/01690968608404677
[3]   Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca's area [J].
Bahlmann, Joerg ;
Schubotz, Ricarda I. ;
Friederici, Angela D. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 42 (02) :525-534
[4]   Bridging the Gap: Learning of Acoustic Nonadjacent Dependencies by a Songbird [J].
Chen, Jiani ;
ten Cate, Carel .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2017, 43 (03) :295-302
[5]   Zebra finches can use positional and transitional cues to distinguish vocal element strings [J].
Chen, Jiani ;
ten Cate, Carel .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2015, 117 :29-34
[6]   Mass counts: ERP correlates of non-adjacent dependency learning under different exposure conditions [J].
Citron, Francesca M. M. ;
Oberecker, Regine ;
Friederici, Angela D. ;
Mueller, Jutta L. .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2011, 487 (03) :282-286
[7]   Distant. melodies: Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences [J].
Creel, SC ;
Newport, EL ;
Aslin, RN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2004, 30 (05) :1119-1130
[8]   Temporal Attention as a Scaffold for Language Development [J].
de Diego-Balaguer, Ruth ;
Martinez-Alvarez, Anna ;
Pons, Ferran .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
[9]   Rule learning over consonants and vowels in a non-human animal [J].
de la Mora, Daniela M. ;
Toro, Juan M. .
COGNITION, 2013, 126 (02) :307-312
[10]  
de Vries MH, 2011, BIOLINGUISTICS, V5, P10