The Choice Should Be Yours: Diabetes-Related Distress by Insulin Delivery Method for People with Type 1 Diabetes

被引:9
作者
Wardian, Jana L. [1 ]
True, Mark W. [2 ]
Folaron, Irene [2 ]
Colburn, Jeff [2 ]
Tate, Joshua M. [2 ]
Beckman, Darrick J. [1 ]
机构
[1] JBSA Lackland Air Force Base, Wilford Hall Med Ctr, Diabet Ctr Excellence, 1100 Wilford Hall Loop, San Antonio, TX 78236 USA
[2] San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Div Endocrinol, JBSA Ft Sam Houston, TX USA
关键词
Type; 1; diabetes; Diabetes-related distress; Insulin delivery method; Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII); Multiple daily injections (MDI); INJECTIONS; INFUSION; STATEMENT; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1089/dia.2019.0228
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends psychosocial assessment for people with diabetes, including diabetes-related distress. Elevated diabetes-related distress is associated with poor self-management, lower medication adherence, and poorer quality of life. Insulin delivery methods are multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Because people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) require comprehensive insulin therapy to manage blood glucose, we explored the association of insulin delivery methods and diabetes distress in this group. Methods: The U.S. Air Force Diabetes Center of Excellence (DCOE), a specialty clinic for adults who are Military Health System beneficiaries, administers the validated 17-item Diabetes-related Distress Scale (DDS-17) as part of standard care. Patient data were analyzed from June 2015 to August 2016 using SPSS version 22. Patients were free to choose the method of insulin delivery with minimal or no additional cost. Results: There were 203 patients with T1DM who completed the DDS-17 as part of standard care during the time period. Patients were categorized as CSII (57.6%) or MDI (42.4%). Women were significantly more likely to choose MDI over CSII than men (P = 0.003). DDS-17 scores were low in both groups, and there were no significant differences in DDS-17 by insulin delivery method. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between CSII (7.9% or 63 mmol/mol) and MDI (8.1% or 65 mmol/mol) users (P = 0.22) and no significant differences in body mass index (BMI) between patients using CSII (M = 28.33 kg/m(2)) and MDI (28.49 kg/m(2)) users (P = 0.15). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that if patients are relatively free to choose the insulin delivery method (minimal or no financial constraints), there were no differences in diabetes distress scores, HbA1c, or BMI between CSII and MDI. Therefore, people with T1DM may benefit from choosing the method of insulin delivery that will enable them to achieve individual goals and manage diabetes-related distress.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
American Diabetes Association, 2019, Diabetes Care, V42, pS71, DOI DOI 10.2337/DC19-S007
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V356, pj963, DOI [10.1136/bmj.j963pmid:28254739, DOI 10.1136/bmj.j1285]
[3]   A Randomized trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and intensive injection therapy in type 1 diabetes for patients with long-standing poor glycemic control [J].
DeVries, JH ;
Snoek, FJ ;
Kostense, PJ ;
Masurel, N ;
Heine, RJ .
DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (11) :2074-2080
[4]   What is the best measure for assessing diabetes distress? A comparison of the Problem Areas in Diabetes and Diabetes Distress Scale: results from Diabetes MILES-Australia [J].
Fenwick, Eva K. ;
Rees, Gwyn ;
Holmes-Truscott, Elizabeth ;
Browne, Jessica L. ;
Pouwer, Frans ;
Speight, Jane .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 23 (05) :667-680
[5]   Predicting diabetes distress in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study [J].
Fisher, L. ;
Mullan, J. T. ;
Skaff, M. M. ;
Glasgow, R. E. ;
Arean, P. ;
Hessler, D. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (06) :622-627
[6]   When Is Diabetes Distress Clinically Meaningful? Establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale [J].
Fisher, Lawrence ;
Hessler, Danielle M. ;
Polonsky, William H. ;
Mullan, Joseph .
DIABETES CARE, 2012, 35 (02) :259-264
[7]   Diabetes Distress but Not Clinical Depression or Depressive Symptoms Is Associated With Glycemic Control in Both Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses [J].
Fisher, Lawrence ;
Mullan, Joseph T. ;
Arean, Patricia ;
Glasgow, Russell E. ;
Hessler, Danielle ;
Masharani, Umesh .
DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (01) :23-28
[8]   Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review [J].
FitzGerald, Chloe ;
Hurst, Samia .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 18
[9]  
Franklin Victoria, 2016, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V10, P647, DOI 10.1177/1932296816639315
[10]   STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS CONSENSUS PANEL ON INSULIN PUMP MANAGEMENT [J].
Grunberger, George ;
Bailey, Timothy Silleck ;
Cohen, A. Jay ;
Flood, Thomas Michael ;
Handelsman, Yehuda ;
Hellman, Richard ;
Jovanovic, Lois ;
Moghissi, Etie S. ;
Orzeck, Eric A. .
ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (05) :746-762