Influence of implant-abutment connection structure on peri-implant bone level in a second molar: A 1-year randomized controlled trial

被引:6
作者
Kim, Jin-Cheol [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jungwon [3 ]
Kim, Sungtae [4 ]
Koo, Ki-Tae [4 ]
Kim, Hae-Young [5 ]
Yeo, In-Sung Luke [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Periodontol, Dent Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Periodontol, Sch Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Randomized controlled trial; Dental implant-abutment design; Alveolar bone loss; DIFFERENT PROSTHETIC INTERFACES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; EXTERNAL CONNECTIONS; NECK CONFIGURATIONS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; MORSE TAPER; PLATFORM; RESISTANCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.4047/jap.2019.11.3.147
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two different implant-abutment connection structures with identical implant design on peri-implant bone level. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This clinical study was a patient-blind randomized controlled trial following the CONSORT 2010 checklists. This trial was conducted in 24 patients recruited between March 2013 and July 2015. Implants with internal friction connection were compared to those with external hex connection. One implant for each patient was installed, replacing the second molar. Implant-supported crowns were delivered at four months after implant insertion. Standardized periapical radiographs were taken at prosthesis delivery (baseline), and one year after delivery. On the radiographs, distance from implant shoulder to first bone-to-implant contact (DIB) and peri-implant area were measured, which were the primary and secondary outcome, respectively. RESULTS. Eleven external and eleven internal implants were analyzed. Mean changes of DIB from baseline to 1-year postloading were 0.59 (0.95) mm for the external and 0.01 (0.68) mm for the internal connection. Although no significant differences were found between the two groups, medium effect size was found in DIB between the connections (Cohen's d = 0.67). CONCLUSION. Considering the effect size in DIB, this study suggested the possibility of the internal friction connection structure for more effective preservation of marginal bone.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Is Marginal Bone Loss around Oral Implants the Result of a Provoked Foreign Body Reaction? [J].
Albrektsson, Tomas ;
Dahlin, Christer ;
Jemt, Torsten ;
Sennerby, Lars ;
Turri, Alberto ;
Wennerberg, Ann .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (02) :155-165
[2]   Crestal Bone Loss and Oral Implants [J].
Albrektsson, Tomas ;
Buser, Daniel ;
Sennerby, Lars .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (06) :783-791
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
[4]   Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido ;
Verri, Fellippo Ramos ;
Bonfante, Estevam Augusto ;
Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira ;
Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 70 :14-22
[5]   Astra Tech and Branemark system implants:: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions [J].
Åstrand, P ;
Engquist, B ;
Dahlgren, S ;
Gröndahl, K ;
Engquist, E ;
Feldmann, H .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (04) :413-420
[6]   Influence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: an experimental study in dog [J].
Baffone, Gabriele M. ;
Botticelli, Daniele ;
Pantani, Fabio ;
Cardoso, Leandro Carvalho ;
Schweikert, Michael T. ;
Lang, Niklaus P. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (04) :438-444
[7]  
Bateli M, 2011, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V26, P290
[8]   Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface [J].
Broggini, N ;
McManus, LM ;
Hermann, JS ;
Medina, R ;
Schenk, RK ;
Buser, D ;
Cochran, DL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2006, 85 (05) :473-478
[9]  
Canullo L, 2012, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V27, P927
[10]   The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Caricasulo, Riccardo ;
Malchiodi, Luciano ;
Ghensi, Paolo ;
Fantozzi, Giuliano ;
Cucchi, Alessandro .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (04) :653-664