Using Stage-Dependent Temperature Parameters to Improve Phenological Model Prediction Accuracy in Rice Models

被引:10
作者
Sharifi, Hussain [1 ]
Hijmans, Robert J. [2 ]
Hill, James E. [1 ]
Linquist, Bruce A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; PHOTOTHERMAL RESPONSES; THERMAL TIME; YIELD; SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATION; CULTIVARS; ARKANSAS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2016.01.0072
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Crop phenology models that use constant temperature parameters across developmental stages may be less accurate and have temperature-dependent systematic prediction error (bias). Using the DD10 model, we evaluated default and optimized (DD_Opt) temperature parameters using data from seven California rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars grown in six locations over 3 yr (2012-2014). Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of using stage-dependent temperature parameters on model performance using two-and three-stage optimization approaches. Optimized temperature parameters, or DD_Opt (RMSE: 2.3-5.4 d), performed better than DD10 (RMSE: 2.9-7.3 d). A temperature sensitivity analysis indicated that the time from planting to panicle initiation was most sensitive to temperature (every 1 degrees C increase decreased days to panicle initiation by 1.8 d) while time from heading to R7 (marked by the appearance of one yellow hull on the main stem panicle) was not affected by temperature. Optimized temperature parameters varied between stages, with base temperature decreasing and optimum temperature increasing with plant development. Compared to the DD_Opt, two-stage optimization (planting-heading and heading-R7) reduced the RMSE by 0.8 d and the systematic error by 0.6 d degrees C-1. Threestage optimization (planting-panicle initiation, panicle initiation-heading, and heading-R7) further reduced RMSE by 1.1 d and systematic error by 1.4 d degrees C-1 for preheading. These results demonstrate the importance of using stage-dependent parameters to improve accuracy of phenological models, which may be important when models are used to study the crop response to climate change, field management options, ecosystem productivity, breeding, and yield gap analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 453
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Application of the CSM-CERES-Rice model for evaluation of plant density and nitrogen management of fine transplanted rice for an irrigated semiarid environment [J].
Ahmad, Shakeel ;
Ahmad, Ashfaq ;
Soler, Cecilia Manuela Tojo ;
Ali, Hakoomat ;
Zia-Ul-Haq, Muhammad ;
Anothai, Jakarat ;
Hussain, Abid ;
Hoogenboom, Gerrit ;
Hasanuzzaman, Mirza .
PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2012, 13 (02) :200-218
[2]  
Alocilja E.C., 1991, Predicting Crop Phenology, P181
[3]   A two-step approach to quantify photothermal effects on pre-flowering rice phenology. [J].
Awan, M. I. ;
van Oort, P. A. J. ;
Bastiaans, L. ;
van der Putten, P. E. L. ;
Yin, X. ;
Meinke, H. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 155 :14-22
[4]  
Bouman B, 2001, ORYZA2000 MODELING L
[5]   Description and evaluation of the rice growth model ORYZA2000 under nitrogen-limited conditions [J].
Bouman, BAM ;
van Laar, HH .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2006, 87 (03) :249-273
[6]  
CA Cooperative Rice Research Foundation, 2014, RIC PROD CCRRF RES V
[7]  
Chatterjee S., 2015, Regression analysis by example
[8]   Analysis and modelling of water and near water temperatures in flooded rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J].
Confalonieri, R ;
Mariani, L ;
Bocchi, S .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2005, 183 (2-3) :269-280
[9]   Rice reproductive development stage thermal time and calendar day intervals for six US rice cultivars in the Grand Prairie, Arkansas, over 4 years [J].
Counce, P. A. ;
Siebenmorgen, T. J. ;
Ambardekar, A. A. .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 2015, 167 (02) :262-276
[10]   A Model to Predict Safe Stages of Development for Rice Field Draining and Field Tests of the Model Predictions in the Arkansas Grand Prairie [J].
Counce, P. A. ;
Watkins, K. B. ;
Brye, K. R. ;
Siebenmorgen, T. J. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2009, 101 (01) :113-119