Effects of footwear on three-dimensional tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion during running

被引:31
|
作者
Peltz, Cathryn D. [1 ]
Haladik, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Hoffman, Scott E. [1 ]
McDonald, Michael [1 ]
Ramo, Nicole L. [1 ]
Divine, George [2 ]
Nurse, Matthew [3 ]
Bey, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ctr Bone & Joint, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Nike Inc, Nike Sport Res Lab, Beaverton, OR USA
关键词
Kinematics; Barefoot; Minimalist; Motion control; Dynamic; RISK-FACTORS; BAREFOOT; INJURIES; RUNNERS; MINIMALIST; MECHANICS; SHOES; ANKLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.05.016
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Running is a popular form of recreation, but injuries are common and may be associated with abnormal joint motion. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of three footwear conditions - barefoot (BF), an ultraflexible training shoe (FREE), and a motion control shoe (MC) - on 3D foot and ankle motion. Dynamic, biplane radiographic images were acquired from 12 runners during overground running. 3D rotations of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints were quantified in terms of plantarflexion/dorsiflexion (PF/DF), inversion/eversion (IN/EV) and internal/external rotation (IR/ER). Across the early stance phase (defined as footstrike to heel-off), BF running demonstrated greater tibiotalar joint range of motion for PF/DF (28.2 +/- 8.3 degrees) and IR/ER (7.0 +/- 1.4 degrees) than the shod conditions (FREE: PF/DF=15.1 +/- 5.9 degrees, IR/ER=4.8 +/- 2.1 degrees; MC: PF/DF=15.0 +/- 6.2 degrees, IR/ER=4.3 +/- 0.7 degrees). Also at the tibiotalar joint, BF running resulted in a position significantly more plantarflexed (BF: 2.0 +/- 12.5 degrees, FREE: 15.7 +/- 12.2 degrees, MC: 16.5 +/- 9.3 degrees) and internally rotated (BF: 12.9 +/- 4.5 degrees, FREE: 10.7 +/- 4.3 degrees, MC: 10.6 +/- 3.9 degrees) at footstrike compared to both shod conditions. No differences were detected between the shod conditions at any point in the early stance phase at the tibiotalar joint. The MC condition demonstrated significant differences compared to FREE at several points throughout the early stance phase at the subtalar joint, with the greatest differences seen at 30% in PF/DF (MC -1.4 +/- 8.8 degrees: FREE: -0.5 +/- 9.0 degrees), IN/EV (MC -8.1 +/- 5.7 degrees: FREE -6.3 +/- 5.5 degrees) and IR/ER (MC -9.5 +/- 5.3 degrees: FREE: -8.7 +/- 5.2 degrees). These findings indicate that footwear has subtle effects on joint motion mainly between BF and shod conditions at the tibiotalar joint and between shod conditions at the subtalar joint. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2647 / 2653
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of motion control footwear on running: A systematic review
    Cheung, Roy T. H.
    Wong, Michael Y. M.
    Ng, Gabriel Y. F.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2011, 29 (12) : 1311 - 1319
  • [2] Reporting guidelines for running biomechanics and footwear studies using three-dimensional motion capture
    Hebert-Losier, Kim
    Dai, Boyi
    Nunome, Hiroyuki
    Kong, Pui Wah
    Hobara, Hiroaki
    Hsu, Wei-Chun
    Bradshaw, Elizabeth J.
    Fong, Daniel T. P.
    Vanwanseele, Benedicte
    SPORTS BIOMECHANICS, 2023, 22 (03) : 473 - 484
  • [3] Acute effect of foot strike patterns on in vivo tibiotalar and subtalar joint kinematics during barefoot running
    Ye, Dongqiang
    Li, Lu
    Zhang, Shen
    Xiao, Songlin
    Sun, Xiaole
    Wang, Shaobai
    Fu, Weijie
    JOURNAL OF SPORT AND HEALTH SCIENCE, 2024, 13 (01) : 108 - 117
  • [4] The influence of footwear on foot motion during walking and running
    Morio, Cedric
    Lake, Mark J.
    Gueguen, Nils
    Rao, Guillaume
    Baly, Laurent
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2009, 42 (13) : 2081 - 2088
  • [5] The effects of squatting footwear on three-dimensional lower limb and spine kinetics
    Southwell, Daniel J.
    Petersen, Shane A.
    Beach, Tyson A. C.
    Graham, Ryan B.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2016, 31 : 111 - 118
  • [6] Analysis of surface-to-surface distance mapping during three-dimensional motion at the ankle and subtalar joints
    Siegler, Sorin
    Konow, Tobias
    Belvedere, Claudio
    Ensini, Andrea
    Kulkarni, Rewati
    Leardini, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 76 : 204 - 211
  • [7] The interaction effect of different footwear types and static navicular drop or dynamic ankle pronation on the joint stiffness of the lower limb during running
    Esmaeili, Ali
    Hosseininejad, Sayed Esmaeil
    Jafarnezhadgero, Amirali
    Dionisio, Valdeci Carlos
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2024, 108 : 28 - 34
  • [8] Three-Dimensional In Vivo Kinematics of the Subtalar Joint During Dorsi-Plantarflexion and Inversion-Eversion
    Goto, Akira
    Moritomo, Hisao
    Itohara, Tomonobu
    Watanabe, Tetsu
    Sugamoto, Kazuomi
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 30 (05) : 432 - 438
  • [9] The effects of marathon running on three-dimensional knee kinematics during walking and running in recreational runners
    Tian, Fei
    Li, Ningwei
    Zheng, Zhi
    Huang, Qiuyue
    Zhu, Ting
    Li, Qiang
    Wang, Wenjin
    Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
    Wang, Shaobai
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2020, 75 : 72 - 77
  • [10] Three-Dimensional Kinematics of the Talocrural and Subtalar Joints During Drop Landing
    Fukano, Mako
    Kuroyanagi, Yuji
    Fukubayashi, Toru
    Banks, Scott
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2014, 30 (01) : 160 - 165