An augmented capital asset pricing model using new macroeconomic determinants

被引:4
作者
Chinh Duc Pham [1 ]
Le Tan Phuoc [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ & Law, VNU HCM, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Eastern Int Univ, Becamex Business Sch, Thu Dau Mot, Vietnam
关键词
Asset pricing; Corporate finance; Interest rate; Government long-term bond rate; Exchange rate; Financial economics; Money; Pricing; Macroeconomics; Econometrics; CROSS-SECTION; CRITICAL REEXAMINATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; MARKET VALUE; RETURN; INVESTMENT; EQUILIBRIUM; RISK; ANOMALIES; EARNINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05185
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Using the interview results of 26 experienced scholars, managers, and professional stock traders in conjunction with findings of recent studies in economics, we proposed an augmented asset pricing model using the macroeconomic determinants representing the macroeconomic state variables to explain the nexus between these risks and the U.S. stock returns. This non-traded factor model (MAPM) is inspired by and based on the macroeconomic theory and models and consists of the market return, U.S. prime rate, U.S. government long-term bond rate, and exchange rate of USD/EUR as in Eq. (1). Using the Bayesian approach (via two Bayes and t.Bayes estimators) and monthly returns of the S&P 500 stocks from 2007- 2019, our results showed the MAPM consistently yielded a statistically significant greater forecasting, explanatory power, and model adequacy compared to the most used capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in practice. Interestingly, our study found and confirmed (t-statistic > 3) that the last two macroeconomic determinants have a statistically significant positive effect on the stock returns, which also supports the MAPM. These findings suggest the MAPM is a more efficient and advantageous model compared to the CAPM. So, practitioners would be better off employing the MAPM over CAPM in practice and research.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 112 条
[21]   A CRITIQUE OF SIZE-RELATED ANOMALIES [J].
BERK, JB .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1995, 8 (02) :275-286
[22]   DEBT EQUITY RATIO AND EXPECTED COMMON-STOCK RETURNS - EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE [J].
BHANDARI, LC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1988, 43 (02) :507-528
[23]   State variables, macroeconomic activity, and the cross section of individual stocks [J].
Boons, Martijn .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 119 (03) :489-511
[24]   ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY AND UTILITY STOCK RETURNS [J].
BOWER, DH ;
BOWER, RS ;
LOGUE, DE .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1984, 39 (04) :1041-1054
[25]  
Bullard J, 2009, FED RESERVE BANK ST, V91, P403
[26]  
Campbell J. Y, 2019, 14031 HARV BUS SCH
[27]   Efficient tests of stock return predictability [J].
Campbell, John Y. ;
Yogo, Motohiro .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 81 (01) :27-60
[28]   On persistence in mutual fund performance [J].
Carhart, MM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (01) :57-82
[29]  
Cebrian F. J., 2016, J APPL BUS RES, V32, P325
[30]   On Comparing Asset Pricing Models [J].
Chib, Siddhartha ;
Zeng, Xiaming ;
Zhao, Lingxiao .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2020, 75 (01) :551-577