Regional Economic Competition, Fiscal Subsidies, and Overcapacity

被引:0
作者
Chen, Weijia [1 ]
Gong, Wen [2 ]
Jiang, Zhou [3 ]
Jin, Peizhen [4 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Agr Bank China, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Finance & Econ, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] East China Normal Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Capacity Utilization; Economic Competition; Fiscal Subsidies; Industrial Enterprises; Non-Radial Distance Function; Overcapacity; Promotion Tournament; GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES; DECENTRALIZATION; CAPACITY; GROWTH; CHINA; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; INDUSTRY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4018/JGIM.313410
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Promotion tournaments theory and regional economic competition can be used to explain China's overcapacity. This study used the non-radial distance function to evaluate the overcapacity considering resource and environmental pollution, combined with Chinese industrial enterprise data, to evaluate the fiscal subsidies and their impact on regional industrial capacity. Empirical evidence based on provincial panel data shows that to strive for more foreign investment, local governments tend to increase fiscal subsidies to industrial enterprises and inhibit capacity utilization, but the technology diffusion and competitive effect of foreign investment can also weaken this adverse effect. The heterogeneity analysis based on geographical location shows that the fiscal subsidies to industrial enterprises weaken the improvement effect of economic competition on capacity utilization in coastal cities, but there is no such impact in inland cities. Reducing the government's excessive intervention and promoting orderly competition are essential to eliminating overcapacity.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   The impact of unequal regional distribution of fiscal resources on China's post-reform economic growth [J].
Huang, Jr-Tsung ;
Chang, Ming-Lei .
DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2020, 38 (02) :226-241
[32]   Variety, technological intensity and economic growth at the regional level in Argentina [J].
Barletta, Florencia ;
Suarez, Diana .
PSL QUARTERLY REVIEW, 2024, 77 (310) :289-311
[33]   The Impact of Fiscal Subsidies on New Energy Enterprises Sustainable Development Performance from the Climate Policy Uncertainty Perspective [J].
Wang, Miao ;
Wang, Yiduo ;
Lei, Lei .
EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2025, 61 (08) :2475-2489
[34]   Government Subsidies, Overinvestment by Enterprises and Overcapacity of New Energy Industry - Take China's Listed Photovoltaic Enterprises as an Example [J].
Qin, Fengqin ;
Song, Feifei .
EKOLOJI, 2019, 28 (107) :2939-2944
[35]   Government subsidies, market competition and the TFP of new energy enterprises [J].
Lin, Boqiang ;
Zhang, Aoxiang .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 216
[36]   Two tales of two US states: Regional fiscal austerity and economic performance [J].
Rickman, Dan S. ;
Wang, Hongbo .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2018, 68 :46-55
[37]   The effects of public research and subsidies on regional structural strength [J].
Brenner, Thomas ;
Pudelko, Franziska .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2019, 29 (05) :1433-1458
[38]   Investment Subsidies Effectiveness: Evidence from a Regional Program [J].
Chinetti, Simone .
ITALIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2023, 9 (02) :723-759
[39]   Aid, Economic Reform, and Public Sector Fiscal Behavior in Developing Countries [J].
McGillivray, Mark .
REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2009, 13 (03) :526-542
[40]   National fiscal consolidations and regional inequality in Europe [J].
Agnello, Luca ;
Fazio, Giorgio ;
Sousa, Ricardo M. .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 9 (01) :59-80