Failure of nonoperative management of abdominal solid organ injuries

被引:35
作者
Galvan, Dan A.
Peitzman, Andrew B.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
angioembolization; blunt solid organ (liver; spleen); injury; nonoperative management;
D O I
10.1097/MCC.0b013e328010d4ad
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose of review Nonoperative management of the spleen has been the conventional approach for dealing with blunt splenic injury in children for 25 years. Following acceptance in the field of pediatric surgery, nonoperative management of blunt injury to the liver and spleen became the template in adult trauma surgery. It has proven to be of unequivocal benefit to the majority of hemodynamically stable pediatric and adult patients who have suffered blunt liver or splenic trauma. Offsetting these gains, has been the presence of failures. Recent findings The recent literature has focused on factors which may impact the nonoperative management success or failure rate. These factors include initiation of guidelines, risk of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection, character of clinical judgment, role of computed tomography in detecting associated intraabdominal injuries, the presence of more than one solid organ injury, risk of associated hollow viscus injury, and the drawbacks of angioembolization. Summary Despite the failures of nonoperative management outlined in this review, the approach has been generally successful. Efforts at improving organ salvage rates and diminishing failures with this approach continue. Notwithstanding our enthusiasm to advance this method of patient care, we must avoid imperiling a subpopulation of patients in our attempt to improve nonoperative management success rates.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 594
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]  
Sharma OP, 2005, AM SURGEON, V71, P379
[32]  
Singer D B, 1973, Perspect Pediatr Pathol, V1, P285
[33]   Variation in treatment of pediatric spleen injury at trauma centers versus nontrauma centers: A call for dissemination of American Pediatric Surgical Association benchmarks and guidelines [J].
Stylianos, S ;
Egorova, NI ;
Guice, KS ;
Arons, RR ;
Oldham, KT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 202 (02) :247-251
[34]   Outcomes from pediatric solid organ injury: role of standardized care guidelines [J].
Stylianos, S .
CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2005, 17 (03) :402-406
[35]   Compliance with evidence-based guidelines in children with isolated spleen or liver injury: A prospective study [J].
Stylianos, S .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2002, 37 (03) :453-456
[36]   Overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis and trauma: Time to consider revaccination? [J].
Taylor, MD ;
Genuit, T ;
Napolitano, LM .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 59 (06) :1482-1485
[37]   Evolution of non-operative management for blunt splenic trauma in children [J].
Thompson, Stephen R. ;
Holland, Andrew J. A. .
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2006, 42 (05) :231-234
[38]  
UPADHYAYA P, 1968, SURG GYNECOL OBSTETR, V126, P781
[39]   Conservative management of splenic trauma: history and current trends [J].
Upadhyaya, P .
PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (9-10) :617-627
[40]   Blunt splenic injury: Operation versus angiographic embolization [J].
Wahl, WL ;
Ahrns, KS ;
Chen, S ;
Hemmila, MR ;
Rowe, SA ;
Arbabi, S .
SURGERY, 2004, 136 (04) :891-897