Performance of the Xinanjiang Model

被引:8
作者
Ahirwar, A. [1 ]
Jain, M. K. [1 ]
Perumal, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Roorkee, Dept Hydrol, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India
来源
HYDROLOGIC MODELING | 2018年 / 81卷
关键词
Xinanjiang model; NSE; Wet; Average; Dry; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; CALIBRATION; SIMULATION; DYNAMICS; CURVE;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-10-5801-1_49
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Xinanjiang rainfall-run-off model is a popular model applied extensively in the humid and sub-humid regions of the world for forecasting of flood, climate change studies and water resources assessment, planning and management. However, its performance in the Indian climatic conditions has not been extensively studied. In the present study, attempt is made to evaluate the performance of the Xinanjiang model for run-off simulation in six Indian watersheds having different climatic conditions (wet, average and dry). The results of the study indicate better model performance in wet catchments with average values of NSE = 0.88 and average R-2 = 0.89. The average values of NSE and R2 on watersheds with average climatic condition obtained as 0.67 and 0.68, respectively, indicating average performance of the model. The performance of the model may be considered poor on watersheds with dry climatic conditions as the average estimated values of NSE and R-2 being 0.49 and 0.52, respectively. The results indicate the suitability of the application of Xinanjiang model in catchments characterised by wet and average climatic conditions and poor in dry climate conditions of India. However, extensive study is required to arrive at a final inference about the suitability of application of this model considering a number of catchments in the country.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 731
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Application of a macroscale hydrologic model to estimate the water balance of the Arkansas Red River basin [J].
Abdulla, FA ;
Lettenmaier, DP ;
Wood, EF ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D3) :7449-7459
[2]   A top-down framework for watershed model evaluation and selection under uncertainty [J].
Bai, Yaoling ;
Wagener, Thorsten ;
Reed, Patrick .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2009, 24 (08) :901-916
[3]   CATCHMENT GEOMORPHOLOGY AND THE DYNAMICS OF RUNOFF CONTRIBUTING AREAS [J].
BEVEN, K ;
WOOD, EF .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1983, 65 (1-3) :139-158
[4]  
Chang SHU, 2010, J RESOUR ECOL, V1, P186
[5]   Comparison of Meteorological, Hydrological and Agricultural Drought Responses to Climate Change and Uncertainty Assessment [J].
Duan, Kai ;
Mei, Yadong .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (14) :5039-5054
[6]   EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION FOR CONCEPTUAL RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS [J].
DUAN, QY ;
SOROOSHIAN, S ;
GUPTA, V .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (04) :1015-1031
[7]  
Dumenil L., 1992, Advances in theoretical hydrology: a tribute to James Dooge., P129
[8]   Long-term hydrologic simulation using SCS-CN-based improved soil moisture accounting procedure [J].
Durbude, Dilip G. ;
Jain, Manoj K. ;
Mishra, Surendra K. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2011, 25 (04) :561-579
[9]  
Gan TY, 1996, WATER RESOUR RES, V32, P3513, DOI 10.1029/96WR02195
[10]  
Gan TY, 1997, J HYDROL, V192, P81, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03114-9