Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis

被引:8
作者
Kim, Won Hwa [1 ]
Chang, Jung Min [1 ]
Koo, Hye Ryoung [2 ]
Seo, Mirinae [3 ]
Bae, Min Sun [1 ]
Lee, Joongyub [4 ]
Moon, Woo Kyung [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehangno, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Med Res Collaborating Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Digital mammography; digital breast tomosynthesis; breast neoplasms; sensitivity and specificity; diagnostic performance; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; POPULATION; CLASSIFICATION; AVAILABILITY; PERFORMANCE; READERS; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1177/0284185116647211
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Although digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is an emerging technique yielding higher sensitivity and specificity compared to digital mammography (DM) alone, relative contribution of prior mammograms on the interpretation of DBT combined with DM has not been investigated. Purpose: To retrospectively compare the diagnostic performances of DM, DM+DBT, and DM+DBT with prior mammograms. Material and Methods: Three breast radiologists independently reviewed images of 116 patients with 24 cancers in the sequential order of DM, DM+DBT, and DM+DBT with prior mammograms using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment categories. Results: The average areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of DM, DM+DBT, and DM+DBT with prior mammograms were 0.712, 0.777, and 0.816, respectively. Adding prior mammograms did not significantly affect the AUC of DM+DBT (P = 0.108), whereas adding DBT significantly increased the AUC of DM (P = 0.009). Sensitivity for DM, DM+DBT, and DM+DBT with prior mammograms was 58.3%, 69.4%, and 69.4%, and specificities were 84.1%, 85.9%, and 93.8%, respectively. Addition of DBT significantly increased the sensitivity (P = 0.0090) of DM. Prior mammograms significantly improved the specificity of DM+DBT (P + 0.0004), whereas adding prior mammogram did not affect sensitivity of DM+DBT (P = 1.000). Conclusion: DBT significantly increases the overall sensitivity and diagnostic performance of DM. Prior mammograms significantly increase the specificity of DM+DBT but have no significant effect on sensitivity and overall diagnostic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 155
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography
    Burnside, ES
    Sickles, EA
    Sohlich, RE
    Dee, KE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (05) : 1173 - 1177
  • [2] Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Caumo, Francesca
    Pellegrini, Marco
    Brunelli, Silvia
    Tuttobene, Paola
    Bricolo, Paola
    Fanto, Carmine
    Valentini, Marvi
    Montemezzi, Stefania
    Macaskill, Petra
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07) : 583 - 589
  • [3] RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC RATING ANALYSIS - GENERALIZATION TO THE POPULATION OF READERS AND PATIENTS WITH THE JACKKNIFE METHOD
    DORFMAN, DD
    BERBAUM, KS
    METZ, CE
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (09) : 723 - 731
  • [4] Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital Mammography
    Friedewald, Sarah M.
    Rafferty, Elizabeth A.
    Rose, Stephen L.
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Plecha, Donna M.
    Greenberg, Julianne S.
    Hayes, Mary K.
    Copit, Debra S.
    Carlson, Kara L.
    Cink, Thomas M.
    Barke, Lora D.
    Greer, Linda N.
    Miller, Dave P.
    Conant, Emily F.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (24): : 2499 - 2507
  • [5] Localized Detection and Classification of Abnormalities on FFDM and Tomosynthesis Examinations Rated Under an FROC Paradigm
    Gur, David
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Rockette, Howard E.
    Zuley, Margarita L.
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    Chough, Denise M.
    Hakim, Christiane M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (03) : 737 - 741
  • [6] Comparison of Tomosynthesis Plus Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening
    Haas, Brian M.
    Kalra, Vivek
    Geisel, Jaime
    Raghu, Madhavi
    Durand, Melissa
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (03) : 694 - 700
  • [7] Effect of the Availability of Prior Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images on the Interpretation of Mammograms
    Hakim, Christiane M.
    Catullo, Victor J.
    Chough, Denise M.
    Ganott, Marie A.
    Kelly, Amy E.
    Shinde, Dilip D.
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    Wallace, Luisa P.
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gur, David
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [8] Impact of and Interaction between the Availability of Prior Examinations and DBT on the Interpretation of Negative and Benign Mammograms
    Hakim, Christiane M.
    Anello, Marie I.
    Cohen, Cathy S.
    Ganott, Marie A.
    Lu, Amy H.
    Perrin, Ronald L.
    Shah, Ratan
    Spangler, Marion Lee
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gur, David
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 445 - 449
  • [9] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis From Concept to Clinical Care
    Kopans, Daniel B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (02) : 299 - 308
  • [10] HYPOTHESIS-TESTING OF DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY FOR MULTIPLE READERS AND MULTIPLE TESTS - AN ANOVA APPROACH WITH DEPENDENT OBSERVATIONS
    OBUCHOWSKI, NA
    ROCKETTE, HE
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 1995, 24 (02) : 285 - 308