State and National Contexts in Evaluating Cannabis Laws: A Case Study of Washington State

被引:42
作者
Cambron, Christopher [1 ]
Guttmannova, Katarina [2 ,3 ]
Fleming, Charles B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Social Welf, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Ctr Study Hlth & Risk Behav, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Ctr Study Hlth & Risk Behav, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cannabis policy; drug policy; policy evaluation; MEDICAL MARIJUANA LAWS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; USE REPLICATION; UNITED-STATES; ATTITUDES; TRENDS; AVAILABILITY; LEGALIZATION; INCREASE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0022042616678607
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
As of January 2016, 23 U.S. states and the District of Columbia have legalized medical or nonmedical cannabis, with more likely to follow. This dynamic policy context represents a substantial challenge for policy evaluation. Part I of this article provides a summary of state-level cannabis policy components across states and federal action regarding state-level policies. Part II presents a detailed history of cannabis policies in Washington State from 1998 to 2015 and analyzes the potential impacts of the policy changes on cannabis supply and demand. As an early adopter of both medical and nonmedical cannabis policies, Washington State provides an excellent example of the key elements to be considered in evaluating the relationship between policy changes and cannabis use. We highlight the importance of the interplay of federal enforcement priorities and previously adopted state-level cannabis regimes in interpreting the potential impacts of new cannabis policies.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 90
页数:17
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
American Civil Liberties Union of Washington State, 2015, IN 502
[2]   Medical Marijuana Laws and Teen Marijuana Use [J].
Anderson, D. Mark ;
Hansen, Benjamin ;
Rees, Daniel I. .
AMERICAN LAW AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2015, 17 (02) :495-528
[3]   The Role of Dispensaries: The Devil is in the Details [J].
Anderson, D. Mark ;
Rees, Daniel I. .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 33 (01) :235-240
[4]   The Legalization of Recreational Marijuana: How Likely Is the Worst-Case Scenario? [J].
Anderson, D. Mark ;
Rees, Daniel I. .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 33 (01) :221-232
[5]  
[Anonymous], KIDS ARENT ALRIGHT O
[6]  
[Anonymous], UND DEM ILL DRUGS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 23 LEG MED MAR STAT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, EFFECT MED MARIJUANA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WASHINGTONS MARIJUAN
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, MONITORING FUTURE NA