Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation

被引:23
作者
Isaksson, Stina [1 ]
Sydsjo, Gunilla [2 ]
Svanberg, Agneta Skoog [3 ]
Lampic, Claudia [4 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, S-75122 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, S-75122 Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Huddinge, Sweden
关键词
Attitude; information disclosure; oocyte donor; sperm donor; SPERM DONORS; NATIONAL SAMPLE; OOCYTE DONORS; SEMEN DONORS; PERSONALITY-CHARACTERISTICS; IDENTIFIABLE DONORS; ATTITUDES; MOTIVATIONS; EXPERIENCES; FAMILIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.038
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the attitudes and preferences regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release donors of oocytes or sperm. Design: Longitudinal cohort study. Setting: University-based fertility clinics in Sweden. Patient(s): A total of 210 women and men were questioned 5-8 years after their donation of oocytes or sperm. Intervention(s): Questionnaires given to donors prior to their donation and 5-8 years after donation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Donors' attitudes and preferences regarding future contact with their donation offspring. Result(s): A majority of identity-release oocyte (65%) and sperm (70%) donors were positive toward being contacted by an offspring of mature age. More than half wanted to be notified by the clinic when an offspring requested information about them, but about a third were negative toward receiving this information. One in four reported a need for counseling regarding future contact with an offspring. Conclusion(s): Several years after donation, a majority of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors show positive attitudes toward future contact with their offspring. Donors appear to have different preferences for information and support regarding such contact. Fertility clinics and health-care services should provide counseling regarding contact with an offspring to the donors who express a need for this. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1160 / 1166
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion [J].
Amato, Paula ;
Brzyski, Robert ;
Braverman, Andrea ;
Benward, Jean ;
Stein, Andrea ;
Steinbock, Bonnie ;
Wilder, Bruce ;
Reindollar, Richard ;
Lamb, Dolores ;
Robertson, John ;
Daar, Judith ;
Francis, Leslie ;
Spillman, Monique ;
Rebar, Robert ;
Tipton, Sean ;
Fisseha, Senait ;
Ralston, Steven .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (01) :45-49
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, NAMELESS RELATIONS A
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, LAG GEN INT MM
[4]   Danish sperm donors across three decades: motivations and attitudes [J].
Bay, Bjorn ;
Larsen, Peter B. ;
Kesmodel, Ulrik Schioler ;
Ingerslev, Hans Jakob .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (01) :252-+
[5]  
Blyth E., 2009, International Journal of Law, Policy Family, V23, P174, DOI [10.1093/lawfam/ebp002, DOI 10.1093/LAWFAM/EBP002]
[6]   Past semen donors' views about the use of a voluntary contact register [J].
Crawshaw, Marilyn A. ;
Blyth, Eric D. ;
Daniels, Ken D. .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 14 (04) :411-417
[7]   Short Communication: Previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring [J].
Daniels, K ;
Blyth, E ;
Crawshaw, M ;
Curson, R .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (06) :1670-1675
[8]   Semen providers and their three families [J].
Daniels, K ;
Lalos, A ;
Gottlieb, C ;
Lalos, O .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 26 (01) :15-22
[9]  
Daniels K R, 1998, Med Law Int, V3, P117
[10]   Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: issues and implications for them and their families [J].
Daniels, K. R. ;
Kramer, W. ;
Perez-y-Perez, M. V. .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2012, 25 (07) :670-677