On expansion and contraction of DL-Lite knowledge bases

被引:8
作者
Zheleznyakov, Dmitriy [1 ]
Kharlamov, Evgeny [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Nutt, Werner [5 ]
Calvanese, Diego [5 ]
机构
[1] Ocado Technol, Hatfield AL10 9UL, Herts, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Comp Sci, Wolfson Bldg,Pk Rd, Oxford OX1 3QD, England
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Comp Sci, POB 1080 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[4] Robert Bosch GmbH, Bosch Ctr Artificial Intelligence, D-70465 Stuttgart, Germany
[5] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Comp Sci, Piazza Domenicani 3, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF WEB SEMANTICS | 2019年 / 57卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Knowledge evolution; Knowledge expansion; Knowledge contraction; DL-Lite; Semantics; Complexity; Algorithms; INSTANCE-LEVEL; OWL; EVOLUTION; REVISION; MODEL; JUSTIFICATIONS; ALGORITHMS; ACCESS; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1016/j.websem.2018.12.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Knowledge bases (KBs) are not static entities: new information constantly appears and some of the previous knowledge becomes obsolete. In order to reflect this evolution of knowledge, KBs should be expanded with the new knowledge and contracted from the obsolete one. This problem is well-studied for propositional but much less for first-order KBs. In this work we investigate knowledge expansion and contraction for KBs expressed in DL-Lite, a family of description logics (DLs) that underlie the tractable fragment OWL 2 QL of the Web Ontology Language OWL 2. We start with a novel knowledge evolution framework and natural postulates that evolution should respect, and compare our postulates to the well-established AGM postulates. We then review well-known model and formula-based approaches for expansion and contraction for propositional theories and show how they can be adapted to the case of DL-Lite. In particular, we show intrinsic limitations of model-based approaches: besides the fact that some of them do not respect the postulates we have established, they ignore the structural properties of KBs. This leads to undesired properties of evolution results: evolution of DL-Lite KBs cannot be captured in DL-Lite. Moreover, we show that well-known formula-based approaches are also not appropriate for DL-Lite expansion and contraction: they either have a high complexity of computation, or they produce logical theories that cannot be expressed in DL-Lite. Thus, we propose a novel formula-based approach that respects our principles and for which evolution is expressible in DL-Lite. For this approach we also propose polynomial time deterministic algorithms to compute evolution of DL-Lite KBs when evolution affects only factual data. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Abiteboul S., 1985, Very Large Data Bases. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference, P1
  • [2] Managing Change in Graph-Structured Data Using Description Logics
    Ahmetaj, Shqiponja
    Calvanese, Diego
    Ortiz, Magdalena
    Simkus, Mantas
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC, 2017, 18 (04)
  • [3] ON THE LOGIC OF THEORY CHANGE - PARTIAL MEET CONTRACTION AND REVISION FUNCTIONS
    ALCHOURRON, CE
    GARDENFORS, P
    MAKINSON, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1985, 50 (02) : 510 - 530
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, NMR
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, IJCAI
  • [6] Areces C., 2000, Proc. Advances in Modal Logic, V3, P17
  • [7] Arenas M., 1999, Proceedings of the Eighteenth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, P68, DOI 10.1145/303976.303983
  • [8] The DL-Lite Family and Relations
    Artale, Alessandro
    Calvanese, Diego
    Kontchakov, Roman
    Zakharyaschev, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2009, 36 : 1 - 69
  • [9] Baader F, 2003, DESCRIPTION LOGIC HANDBOOK: THEORY, IMPLEMENTATION AND APPLICATIONS, P43
  • [10] Baader F, 2005, 19TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-05), P364