Everyday social and conversation applications of theory-of-mind understanding by children with autism-spectrum disorders or typical development

被引:74
作者
Peterson, Candida C. [1 ]
Garnett, Michelle [3 ]
Kelly, Adrian [2 ]
Attwood, Tony [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Minds & Hearts, W End, Qld 4101, Australia
关键词
autism; Asperger's disorder; theory-of-mind; conversation; social skill; LANGUAGE; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00787-008-0711-y
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Children with autism-spectrum disorders (ASD) often fail laboratory false-belief tests of theory of mind (ToM). Yet how this impacts on their everyday social behavior is less clear, partly owing to uncertainty over which specific everyday conversational and social skills require ToM understanding. A new caregiver-report scale of these everyday applications of ToM was developed and validated in two studies. Study 1 obtained parent ratings of 339 children (85 with autism; 230 with Asperger's; 24 typically-developing) on the new scale and results revealed (a) that the scale had good psychometric properties and (b) that children with ASD had significantly more everyday mind-reading difficulties than typical developers. In Study 2, we directly tested links between laboratory ToM and everyday mind-reading using teacher ratings on the new scale. The sample of 25 children included 15 with autism and 10 typical developers aged 512 years. Children in both groups who passed laboratory ToM tests had fewer everyday mind-reading difficulties than those of the same diagnosis who failed. Yet, intriguingly, autistic ToM-passers still had more problems with everyday mind-reading than younger typically-developing ToM-failers. The possible roles of family conversation and peer interaction, along with ToM, in everyday social functioning were considered.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 115
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MIND LANGUAGE
[2]  
Astington J., 2003, INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENC, P13
[3]   The future of theory-of-mind research: Understanding motivational states, the role of language, and real-world consequences [J].
Astington, JW .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 72 (03) :685-687
[4]  
Baron-Cohen S., 1997, Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind, DOI 10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001
[5]  
Baron-Cohen S, 2000, UNDERSTANDING OTHER, P3, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199692972.001.0001
[6]   DOES THE AUTISTIC-CHILD HAVE A THEORY OF MIND [J].
BARONCOHEN, S ;
LESLIE, AM ;
FRITH, U .
COGNITION, 1985, 21 (01) :37-46
[7]   Parent and teacher report of pragmatic aspects of communication: use of the Children's Communication Checklist in a clinical setting [J].
Bishop, DVM ;
Baird, G .
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2001, 43 (12) :809-818
[8]  
Bruner J., 1993, UNDERSTANDING OTHER, P267
[9]  
Dissanayake C., 2003, Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development, P213, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203488508
[10]   The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 1995 children's relationships: Bridging the divide between cognitive and social development [J].
Dunn, J .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 37 (05) :507-518