A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists on recommendations of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer

被引:14
|
作者
Kim, Simon P. [1 ,8 ]
Karnes, R. Jeffrey [2 ]
Nguyen, Paul L. [3 ]
Ziegenfuss, Jeanette Y. [4 ]
Thompson, R. Houston [2 ]
Han, Leona C. [5 ]
Shah, Nilay D. [5 ]
Smaldone, Marc C. [6 ]
Gross, Cary P. [7 ,8 ]
Frank, Igor [2 ]
Weight, Christopher J. [9 ]
Beebe, Timothy J. [5 ]
Tilburt, Jon C. [10 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] HealthPartners Inst Educ & Res, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Hlth Care Policy & Res, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[7] Yale Univ, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
[8] Yale Univ, Canc Outcomes Publ Policy & Effectiveness Res Ctr, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
[9] Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Biomed Eth Res Unit, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Mayo Clin, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit, Rochester, MN USA
[12] Mayo Clin, Div Gen Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
screening; prostate-specific antigen; outcomes; survey; prostate cancer; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; FOLLOW-UP; RESPONSE RATES; MORTALITY; TRIAL; GUIDELINE; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12422
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess recommendations for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in a national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists following the recent USA Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) grade D recommendation. Methods A random sample of 1366 radiation oncologists and urologists were identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. From November 2011 to April 2012, a mail survey was sent to query PSA screening recommendations for men at average risk of prostate cancer for the following age groups: 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-74, 75-79 and >= 80 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for differences in PSA-based screening recommendations by physician characteristics. Results Response rates were similar at 52% for radiation oncologists and urologists (P = 0.92). Overall, 51.5% of respondents recommended PSA-based screening for men aged 40-49 years, while nearly all endorsed it for those aged 50-74 years (96.1% for 50-59, 97.3% for 60-69, and 87.7% for 70-74 years). However, screening recommendations decreased to 43.9% and 12.8% for men aged 75-79 and >= 80 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, urologists were more likely to recommend screening for men aged 40-49 (odds ratio [OR] 3.09; P < 0.001) and 50-59 years (OR 3.81; P = 0.01), but less likely for men aged 75-79 (OR 0.66; P = 0.01) and >= 80 years (OR 0.45; P = 0.002) compared with radiation oncologists. Conclusion While radiation oncologists and urologists recommended PSA screening for men aged 50-69 years, there was less agreement about screening for younger (40-49 years old) and older (>= 70 years) men at average risk for prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:E106 / E111
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate cancer screening with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) testing: A retrospective study
    Goktas, Olgun
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 40 (10)
  • [32] Prostate Cancer Screening and Determining the Appropriate Prostate-Specific Antigen Cutoff Values
    Catalona, William J.
    Loeb, Stacy
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2010, 8 (02): : 265 - 270
  • [33] Prostate-specific antigen testing across the spectrum of prostate cancer
    Haythorn, Mark R.
    Ablin, Richard J.
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 5 (04) : 515 - 526
  • [34] Prostate-specific antigen screening and prostate cancer treatment in renal transplantation candidates: A survey of US transplantation centers
    Gin, Greg E.
    Pereira, Jorge F.
    Weinberg, Alan D.
    Mehrazin, Reza
    Lerner, Susan M.
    Sfakianos, John P.
    Phillips, Courtney K.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (02) : 57.e9 - 57.e13
  • [35] On the use of prostate-specific antigen for screening of prostate cancer in European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van Schaik, Ron H.
    Blijenberg, Bert G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Lilja, Hans
    Stenman, Ulf-Hakan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (17) : 3109 - 3119
  • [36] Perceptions of Prostate MRI and Fusion Biopsy of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists for Patients Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer: Results from a National Survey
    Bukavina, Laura
    Tilburt, Jon C.
    Konety, Badrinath
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Gross, Cary P.
    Yu, James B.
    Schumacher, Frederick
    Kutikov, Alexander
    Smaldone, Marc C.
    Kim, Simon P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (02): : 273 - 279
  • [37] Physician attitudes about genetic testing for localized prostate cancer: A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists
    Kim, Simon P.
    Meropol, Neal J.
    Gross, Cary P.
    Tilburt, Jon C.
    Konety, Badrinath
    Yu, James B.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Weight, Christopher J.
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (11) : 501.e15 - 501.e21
  • [38] Managing Localized Prostate Cancer in the Era of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
    Brooks, James D.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 (22) : 3906 - 3909
  • [39] Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
    E A M Heijnsdijk
    A der Kinderen
    E M Wever
    G Draisma
    M J Roobol
    H J de Koning
    British Journal of Cancer, 2009, 101 : 1833 - 1838
  • [40] Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
    Heijnsdijk, E. A. M.
    der Kinderen, A.
    Wever, E. M.
    Draisma, G.
    Roobol, M. J.
    de Koning, H. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (11) : 1833 - 1838