A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists on recommendations of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer

被引:14
|
作者
Kim, Simon P. [1 ,8 ]
Karnes, R. Jeffrey [2 ]
Nguyen, Paul L. [3 ]
Ziegenfuss, Jeanette Y. [4 ]
Thompson, R. Houston [2 ]
Han, Leona C. [5 ]
Shah, Nilay D. [5 ]
Smaldone, Marc C. [6 ]
Gross, Cary P. [7 ,8 ]
Frank, Igor [2 ]
Weight, Christopher J. [9 ]
Beebe, Timothy J. [5 ]
Tilburt, Jon C. [10 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] HealthPartners Inst Educ & Res, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Hlth Care Policy & Res, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[7] Yale Univ, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
[8] Yale Univ, Canc Outcomes Publ Policy & Effectiveness Res Ctr, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
[9] Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Biomed Eth Res Unit, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Mayo Clin, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit, Rochester, MN USA
[12] Mayo Clin, Div Gen Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
screening; prostate-specific antigen; outcomes; survey; prostate cancer; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; FOLLOW-UP; RESPONSE RATES; MORTALITY; TRIAL; GUIDELINE; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12422
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess recommendations for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in a national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists following the recent USA Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) grade D recommendation. Methods A random sample of 1366 radiation oncologists and urologists were identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. From November 2011 to April 2012, a mail survey was sent to query PSA screening recommendations for men at average risk of prostate cancer for the following age groups: 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-74, 75-79 and >= 80 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for differences in PSA-based screening recommendations by physician characteristics. Results Response rates were similar at 52% for radiation oncologists and urologists (P = 0.92). Overall, 51.5% of respondents recommended PSA-based screening for men aged 40-49 years, while nearly all endorsed it for those aged 50-74 years (96.1% for 50-59, 97.3% for 60-69, and 87.7% for 70-74 years). However, screening recommendations decreased to 43.9% and 12.8% for men aged 75-79 and >= 80 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, urologists were more likely to recommend screening for men aged 40-49 (odds ratio [OR] 3.09; P < 0.001) and 50-59 years (OR 3.81; P = 0.01), but less likely for men aged 75-79 (OR 0.66; P = 0.01) and >= 80 years (OR 0.45; P = 0.002) compared with radiation oncologists. Conclusion While radiation oncologists and urologists recommended PSA screening for men aged 50-69 years, there was less agreement about screening for younger (40-49 years old) and older (>= 70 years) men at average risk for prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:E106 / E111
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test
    Bell, Neil
    Gorber, Sarah Connor
    Shane, Amanda
    Joffres, Michel
    Singh, Harminder
    Dickinson, James
    Shaw, Elizabeth
    Dunfield, Lesley
    Tonelli, Marcello
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (16) : 1225 - 1234
  • [2] Recommendations of Active Surveillance for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists
    Kim, Simon P.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Meropol, Neal J.
    Tilburt, Jon C.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Yu, James B.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Kim, Albert
    Gross, Cary P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (02): : 189 - 195
  • [3] A National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists on Perceived Attitudes and Recommendations of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Kim, Simon P.
    Tilburt, Jon C.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Yu, James B.
    Konety, Badrinath
    Nguuen, Paul L.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Gross, Cary P.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (03) : E472 - E481
  • [4] Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Effective for Population Screening of Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Review
    Lee, Yoon Jae
    Park, Ji Eun
    Jeon, Byung Ryul
    Lee, Sang Moo
    Kim, Soo Young
    Lee, You Kyoung
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 33 (04) : 233 - 241
  • [5] The case for prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen
    Andriole, Gerald
    Djavan, Bob
    Fleshner, Neil
    Schroder, Fritz
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2006, 5 (12) : 737 - 745
  • [6] Perceptions of Active Surveillance and Treatment Recommendations for Low-risk Prostate Cancer Results from a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists
    Kim, Simon P.
    Gross, Cary P.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Smaldone, Marc C.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Han, Leona C.
    Yu, James B.
    Trinh, Quoc D.
    Ziegenfuss, Jeanette Y.
    Sun, Maxine
    Tilburt, Jon C.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2014, 52 (07) : 579 - 585
  • [7] Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening for Prostate Cancer Revisiting the Evidence
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (18): : 1866 - 1868
  • [8] Recommendations on Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Screening Reply
    Miller, David C.
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13): : 1373 - 1374
  • [9] Optimal prostate-specific antigen screening interval for prostate cancer
    Kobayashi, D.
    Takahashi, O.
    Fukui, T.
    Glasziou, P. P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (05) : 1250 - 1253
  • [10] Prostate-specific antigen screening and mortality from prostate cancer
    Marcella, Stephen W.
    Rhoads, George G.
    Carson, Jeffrey L.
    Merlino, Frances
    Wilcox, Homer
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (03) : 248 - 253