Automated lithology classification from drill core images using convolutional neural networks

被引:98
作者
Alzubaidi, Fatimah [1 ]
Mostaghimi, Peyman [1 ]
Swietojanski, Pawel [2 ]
Clark, Stuart R. [1 ]
Armstrong, Ryan T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Minerals & Energy Resources, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Lithology logs; Core analysis; FACIES ANALYSIS; WELL LOGS; PREDICTION; LITHOFACIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107933
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In hydrocarbon reservoir evaluation, lithology is a key characteristic for determination of storage capacity and rock properties. Lithology is usually predicted from well log data or directly identified through manual inspection by geologists during core logging. Automatic prediction of lithology has been a focus of many studies inspired by rapid developments in machine learning. Studies mostly focus on predicting lithofacies from well logs using neural networks, and more recently from borehole image logs using convolutional neural network (CNN). Although core is more representative of reservoir lithology than well log data, employing machine learning for automatic lithology identification from core is limited. A CNN-based approach is developed to classify core images into three lithologies: sandstone, limestone, and shale. The model is based on ResNeXt-50 architecture, which had better performance in lithology prediction than ResNet-18 and Inception-v3 architectures. Our method processes core tray images and outputs lithology logs in a fully automated procedure and predicts the lithologies of new (unseen) core with an accuracy of 93.12%.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Al-Anazi A., 2010, Natural Resources Research, V19, P125, DOI [10.1007/s11053-010-9118-9, DOI 10.1007/S11053-010-9118-9]
  • [2] Integrating well log interpretations for lithofacies classification and permeability modeling through advanced machine learning algorithms
    Al-Mudhafar W.J.
    [J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2017, 7 (4) : 1023 - 1033
  • [3] Algan Gorkem, 2019, IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • [4] Machine learning for predicting properties of porous media from 2d X-ray images
    Alqahtani, Naif
    Alzubaidi, Fatimah
    Armstrong, Ryan T.
    Swietojanski, Pawel
    Mostaghimi, Peyman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 184
  • [5] An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching in fixed dimensions
    Arya, S
    Mount, DM
    Netanyahu, NS
    Silverman, R
    Wu, AY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1998, 45 (06) : 891 - 923
  • [6] Baatz M., 2000, XII Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung
  • [7] QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
    Bankhead, Peter
    Loughrey, Maurice B.
    Fernandez, Jose A.
    Dombrowski, Yvonne
    Mcart, Darragh G.
    Dunne, Philip D.
    McQuaid, Stephen
    Gray, Ronan T.
    Murray, Liam J.
    Coleman, Helen G.
    James, Jacqueline A.
    Salto-Tellez, Manuel
    Hamilton, Peter W.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [8] Deep convolutions for in-depth automated rock typing
    Baraboshkin, Evgeny E.
    Ismailova, Leyla S.
    Orlov, Denis M.
    Zhukovskaya, Elena A.
    Kalmykov, Georgy A.
    Khotylev, Oleg, V
    Baraboshkin, Evgeny Yu
    Koroteev, Dmitry A.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 135
  • [9] Bishop C.M., 2006, PATTERN RECOGNITION, P205
  • [10] Automated lithology prediction from PGNAA and other geophysical logs
    Borsaru, M
    Zhou, B
    Aizawa, T
    Karashima, H
    Hashimoto, T
    [J]. APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2006, 64 (02) : 272 - 282