Governance strategies and transaction costs in a renovated electricity market

被引:7
作者
Signorini, Guilherme [1 ]
Ross, R. Brent [1 ]
Peterson, H. Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Power market; Utility; Deregulation; Intervention; Brazil; ORGANIZATIONAL FORM; ECONOMICS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2015.10.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study applies a transaction cost economics (TCE) framework to examine how economic agents adopt governance strategies in Brazil's recently renovated electricity market. In light of a well-established TCE model, four attributes of transactions (i.e., asset-specificity, uncertainty, complexity, and frequency) are examined for three unregulated transactions between generating firms and final consumers. The qualitative analysis of attributes unfolds into a comparative analysis of theory-predicted governance strategies versus strategies observed in the marketplace. It is argued that Williamson's model continues to effectively predict the most efficient governance strategy in the sense of minimizing transaction costs and safeguarding idiosyncratic assets. Misalignment between theory predictions and observations, however, suggests that two additional concepts - implementability and reputation - must be examined alongside with Williamson's four attributes of transactions in order to better explain strategic decisions in Brazil's electricity market. Capital availability, existence of compatible partners, and reputation play crucial roles in explaining those decisions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 159
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Masten S.E., 1996, CASE STUDIES CONTRAC
  • [32] THE ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION - EVIDENCE FROM THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY
    MASTEN, SE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1984, 27 (02) : 403 - 417
  • [33] NEVES M. F., 2010, Estrategias para a cana no Brasil: um negocio classe mundial
  • [34] North D. C., 1990, I I CHANGE EC PERFOR, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  • [35] Peterson H.C., 2001, International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, V4, P149, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00079-9
  • [36] Peterson HC, 2011, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V14, P11
  • [37] Porter Mu., 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
  • [38] SHELANSKI HA, 1995, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V11, P335
  • [39] Historical analysis of institutions and organizations: the case of the Brazilian electricity sector
    Signorini, Guilherme
    Ross, R. Brent
    Peterson, H. Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 11 (01) : 191 - 212
  • [40] SIMON HA, 1978, AM ECON REV, V68, P1