Application of machine learning techniques for predicting survival in ovarian cancer

被引:29
作者
Azar, Amir Sorayaie [1 ]
Rikan, Samin Babaei [1 ]
Naemi, Amin [2 ]
Mohasefi, Jamshid Bagherzadeh [1 ]
Pirnejad, Habibollah [3 ,4 ]
Mohasefi, Matin Bagherzadeh [5 ]
Wiil, Uffe Kock [2 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Maersk Mc Kinney Moller Inst, Ctr Hlth Informat & Technol, Odense, Denmark
[3] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Clin Res Inst, Patient Safety Res Ctr, Orumiyeh, Iran
[4] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management ESHPM, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Sch Med, Bari, Italy
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Clinical features; Survival prediction; Machine learning; Interpretable machine learning; PROGNOSIS; MORTALITY; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; COVID-19; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-022-02087-y
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundOvarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of mortality among women in the United States. Ovarian cancer is also known as forgotten cancer or silent disease. The survival of ovarian cancer patients depends on several factors, including the treatment process and the prognosis. MethodsThe ovarian cancer patients' dataset is compiled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. With the help of a clinician, the dataset is curated, and the most relevant features are selected. Pearson's second coefficient of skewness test is used to evaluate the skewness of the dataset. Pearson correlation coefficient is also used to investigate the associations between features. Statistical test is utilized to evaluate the significance of the features. Six Machine Learning (ML) models, including K-Nearest Neighbors , Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), are implemented for survival prediction in both classification and regression approaches. An interpretable method, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), is applied to clarify the decision-making process and determine the importance of each feature in prediction. Additionally, DTs of the RF model are displayed to show how the model predicts the survival intervals. ResultsOur results show that RF (Accuracy = 88.72%, AUC = 82.38%) and XGBoost (Root Mean Squad Error (RMSE)) = 20.61%, R-2 = 0.4667) have the best performance for classification and regression approaches, respectively. Furthermore, using the SHAP method along with extracted DTs of the RF model, the most important features in the dataset are identified. Histologic type ICD-O-3, chemotherapy recode, year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, tumor stage, and grade are the most important determinant factors in survival prediction. ConclusionTo the best of our knowledge, our study is the first study that develops various ML models to predict ovarian cancer patients' survival on the SEER database in both classification and regression approaches. These ML algorithms also achieve more accurate results and outperform statistical methods. Furthermore, our study is the first study to use the SHAP method to increase confidence and transparency of the proposed models' prediction for clinicians. Moreover, our developed models, as an automated auxiliary tool, can help clinicians to have a better understanding of the estimated survival as well as important features that affect survival.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [11] Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.7326/M14-0698]
  • [12] Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: Beyond the ROC curve
    Cook, Nancy R.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 54 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [13] Cruz JA, 2006, CANCER INFORM, V2, P59
  • [14] Department US, NATL CANC I
  • [15] Measuring Skewness: A Forgotten Statistic?
    Doane, David P.
    Seward, Lori E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICS EDUCATION, 2011, 19 (02):
  • [16] Lung cancer survival period prediction and understanding: Deep learning approaches
    Doppalapudi, Shreyesh
    Qiu, Robin G.
    Badr, Youakim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 148
  • [17] Artificial intelligence in cancer research, diagnosis and therapy
    Elemento, Olivier
    Leslie, Christina
    Lundin, Johan
    Tourassi, Georgia
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2021, 21 (12) : 747 - 752
  • [18] A Comparison of Partial Least Squares (PLS) and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regressions in predicting of couples mental health based on their communicational patterns
    Farahani, Hojjat A.
    Rahiminezhad, Abbas
    Same, Laleh
    Immannezhad, Kobra
    [J]. WCPCG 2010, 2010, 5 : 1459 - 1463
  • [19] Ovarian cancer survival by stage, histotype, and pre-diagnostic lifestyle factors, in the prospective UK Million Women Study
    Gaitskell, Kezia
    Hermon, Carol
    Barnes, Isobel
    Pirie, Kirstin
    Floud, Sarah
    Green, Jane
    Beral, Valerie
    Reeves, Gillian K.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 76
  • [20] Multi-Modal Evolutionary Deep Learning Model for Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis
    Ghoniem, Rania M.
    Algarni, Abeer D.
    Refky, Basel
    Ewees, Ahmed A.
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (04):