Application of machine learning techniques for predicting survival in ovarian cancer

被引:29
作者
Azar, Amir Sorayaie [1 ]
Rikan, Samin Babaei [1 ]
Naemi, Amin [2 ]
Mohasefi, Jamshid Bagherzadeh [1 ]
Pirnejad, Habibollah [3 ,4 ]
Mohasefi, Matin Bagherzadeh [5 ]
Wiil, Uffe Kock [2 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Maersk Mc Kinney Moller Inst, Ctr Hlth Informat & Technol, Odense, Denmark
[3] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Clin Res Inst, Patient Safety Res Ctr, Orumiyeh, Iran
[4] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management ESHPM, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Sch Med, Bari, Italy
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Clinical features; Survival prediction; Machine learning; Interpretable machine learning; PROGNOSIS; MORTALITY; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; COVID-19; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-022-02087-y
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundOvarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of mortality among women in the United States. Ovarian cancer is also known as forgotten cancer or silent disease. The survival of ovarian cancer patients depends on several factors, including the treatment process and the prognosis. MethodsThe ovarian cancer patients' dataset is compiled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. With the help of a clinician, the dataset is curated, and the most relevant features are selected. Pearson's second coefficient of skewness test is used to evaluate the skewness of the dataset. Pearson correlation coefficient is also used to investigate the associations between features. Statistical test is utilized to evaluate the significance of the features. Six Machine Learning (ML) models, including K-Nearest Neighbors , Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), are implemented for survival prediction in both classification and regression approaches. An interpretable method, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), is applied to clarify the decision-making process and determine the importance of each feature in prediction. Additionally, DTs of the RF model are displayed to show how the model predicts the survival intervals. ResultsOur results show that RF (Accuracy = 88.72%, AUC = 82.38%) and XGBoost (Root Mean Squad Error (RMSE)) = 20.61%, R-2 = 0.4667) have the best performance for classification and regression approaches, respectively. Furthermore, using the SHAP method along with extracted DTs of the RF model, the most important features in the dataset are identified. Histologic type ICD-O-3, chemotherapy recode, year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, tumor stage, and grade are the most important determinant factors in survival prediction. ConclusionTo the best of our knowledge, our study is the first study that develops various ML models to predict ovarian cancer patients' survival on the SEER database in both classification and regression approaches. These ML algorithms also achieve more accurate results and outperform statistical methods. Furthermore, our study is the first study to use the SHAP method to increase confidence and transparency of the proposed models' prediction for clinicians. Moreover, our developed models, as an automated auxiliary tool, can help clinicians to have a better understanding of the estimated survival as well as important features that affect survival.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Patients
    Al-Quteimat, Osama M.
    Amer, Amer Mustafa
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 43 (06): : 452 - 455
  • [2] Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    Royston, Patrick
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : 1432 - 1435
  • [3] Delayed care for patients with newly diagnosed cancer due to COVID-19 and estimated impact on cancer mortality in France
    Blay, J. Y.
    Boucher, S.
    Le Vu, B.
    Cropet, C.
    Chabaud, S.
    Perol, D.
    Barranger, E.
    Campone, M.
    Conroy, T.
    Coutant, C.
    De Crevoisier, R.
    Debreuve-Theresette, A.
    Delord, J. P.
    Fumoleau, P.
    Gentil, J.
    Gomez, F.
    Guerin, O.
    Jaffre, A.
    Lartigau, E.
    Lemoine, C.
    Mahe, M. A.
    Mahon, F. X.
    Mathieu-Daude, H.
    Merrouche, Y.
    Penault-Llorca, F.
    Pivot, X.
    Soria, J. C.
    Thomas, G.
    Vera, P.
    Vermeulin, T.
    Viens, P.
    Ychou, M.
    Beaupere, S.
    [J]. ESMO OPEN, 2021, 6 (03)
  • [4] The need to separate the wheat from the chaff in medical informatics Introducing a comprehensive checklist for the (self)-assessment of medical AI studies
    Cabitza, Federico
    Campagner, Andrea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 153
  • [5] Cancer of the ovary, 2022, CANC STAT FACTS
  • [6] SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique
    Chawla, Nitesh V.
    Bowyer, Kevin W.
    Hall, Lawrence O.
    Kegelmeyer, W. Philip
    [J]. 2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
  • [7] Epithelial ovarian cancer mortality among Hispanic women: Sub-ethnic disparities and survival trend across time: An analysis of SEER 1992-2013
    Chen, Chen
    Markossian, Talar W.
    Silva, Abigail
    Tarasenko, Yelena N.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 52 : 134 - 141
  • [8] Chen R, 2020, medRxiv
  • [9] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [10] The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation
    Chicco, Davide
    Warrens, Matthijs J.
    Jurman, Giuseppe
    [J]. PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021,