Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink

被引:44
作者
Dux, Paul E. [1 ]
Marois, Rene [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Vanderbilt Vis Res Ctr, Ctr Integrat & Cognit Neurosci, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2008年 / 3卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0003330
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The attentional blink (AB) refers to humans' impaired ability to detect the second of two targets (T2) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of distractors if it appears within 200-600 ms of the first target (T1). Here we examined whether humans' ability to inhibit distractors in the RSVP stream is a key determinant of individual differences in T1 performance and AB magnitude. Methodology/Principal Findings: We presented subjects with RSVP streams (93.3 ms/item) of letters containing white distractors, a red T1 and a green T2. Subjects' ability to suppress distractors was assessed by determining the extent to which their second target performance was primed by a preceding distractor that shared the same identity as T2. Individual subjects' magnitude of T2 priming from this distractor was found to be negatively correlated with their T1 accuracy and positively related to their AB magnitude. In particular, subjects with attenuated ABs showed negative priming (i.e., worse T2 performance when the priming distractor appeared in the RSVP stream compared to when it was absent), whereas those with large ABs displayed positive priming (i.e., better T2 performance when the priming distractor appeared in the RSVP stream compared to when it was absent). Thus, a subject's ability to suppress distractors, as assessed by T2 priming magnitude, predicted both their T1 performance and AB magnitude. Conclusions/Significance: These results confirm that distractor suppression plays a key role in RSVP target selection and support the hypothesis that the AB results, at least in part, from a failure of distractor inhibition.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[2]   A neural theory of visual attention:: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology [J].
Bundesen, C ;
Habekost, T ;
Kyllingsbæk, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 112 (02) :291-328
[3]  
CHUN MM, 1995, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V21, P109
[4]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72
[5]   The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? [J].
Di Lollo, V ;
Kawahara, J ;
Ghorashi, SMS ;
Enns, JT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2005, 69 (03) :191-200
[6]   On the failure of distractor inhibition in the attentional blink [J].
Dux, Paul E. ;
Harris, Irina M. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (04) :723-728
[7]   On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation [J].
Dux, PE ;
Coltheart, V ;
Harris, IA .
COGNITION, 2006, 99 (03) :355-382
[8]   The meaning of the mask matters - Evidence of conceptual interference in the attentional blink [J].
Dux, PE ;
Coltheart, V .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (10) :775-779
[9]   TRANSIENT SUPPRESSION OF PROCESSING DURING RAPID SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION - ACQUIRED DISTINCTIVENESS OF PROBES MODULATES THE ATTENTIONAL BLINK [J].
MAKI, WS ;
PADMANABHAN, G .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1994, 1 (04) :499-504
[10]   Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink? [J].
Maki, WS ;
Frigen, K ;
Paulson, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1997, 23 (04) :1014-1034