Correlation between balloon release pressure and no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing direct percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:1
|
作者
Wang Yanfei [1 ]
Yao Min [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu Haibo [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang Yuejin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Xie Junmin [1 ]
Jia Xinwei [1 ]
Pan Huanjun [1 ]
Wang Chunyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Baoding 071000, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Cardiovasc Inst, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fu Wai Hosp, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; balloon; pressure; no-reflow phenomenon; MAJOR DEPRESSION; ADENOSINE; ASSOCIATION; REPERFUSION; GUIDELINES; THERAPY; INJURY;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20133002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Balloon release pressure may increase the incidence of no reflow after direct percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This randomized controlled study was designed to analyze the correlation between balloon release pressure and no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing direct PCI. Methods There were 156 AMI patients who underwent PCI from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012, and were divided into two groups according to the stent inflation pressure: a conventional pressure group and a high pressure group. After PCI, angiography was conducted to assess the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade with related artery. Examinations were undertaken on all patients before and after the operation including cardiac enzymes, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, blood glucose, homocysteine, beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS). After interventional therapy, the afore-mentioned parameters in both the conventional pressure group and high pressure group were again analyzed. Results The results showed that CK-MB, HAMD, SAS were significantly different (P <0.05) in all patients after PCI, especially the CK-MB in the high pressure group ((25.7 +/- 7.6) U/L vs. (76.7 +/- 11.8) U/L). CK-MB, HAMD, SAS, and beta-TG were comparative before PCI but they were significantly changed (P <0.05) after intervention. No-reflow phenomenon occurred in 13 patients in the high pressure group, which was significantly higher than in the conventional pressure group (17.11% vs. 6.25%, P <0.05). Conclusion In stent implantation, using a pressure less than 1823.4 kPa balloon to release pressure may be the better choice to reduce the occurrence of no-reflow following direct PCI.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1011
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation between balloon release pressure and no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing direct percutaneous coronary intervention
    Wang Yanfei
    Yao Min
    Liu Haibo
    Yang Yuejin
    Xie Junmin
    Jia Xinwei
    Pan Huanjun
    Wang Chunyan
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2014, 127 (06) : 1008 - 1011
  • [2] The correlation between balloon release pressure and no-reflow in acute myocardial infarction undergoing direct PCI
    Wang Yanfei
    Jia Xinwei
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (16) : C146 - C146
  • [3] Aspirin loading and coronary no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction
    Ndrepepa, Gjin
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Xhepa, Erion
    Joner, Michael
    Sager, Hendrik B.
    Kufner, Sebastian
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Kastrati, Adnan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2024, 54 (06)
  • [4] Verapamil Reverses Myocardial No-Reflow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Qiang Fu
    Wen Lu
    Yi-jie Huang
    Qiang Wu
    Lin-guang Wang
    Hai-bo Wang
    Shu-zhong Jiang
    Yan-jiong Wang
    Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2013, 67 : 911 - 914
  • [5] Verapamil Reverses Myocardial No-Reflow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Fu, Qiang
    Lu, Wen
    Huang, Yi-jie
    Wu, Qiang
    Wang, Lin-guang
    Wang, Hai-bo
    Jiang, Shu-zhong
    Wang, Yan-jiong
    CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2013, 67 (03) : 911 - 914
  • [6] Prediction of platelet distribution width on no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Wang, Yanbo
    Fu, Xianghua
    Wang, Xuechao
    Gu, Xinshun
    Zhao, Yujun
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (19) : E856 - E856
  • [7] Predictors of No-Reflow After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients With Plaque Rupture
    Hong, Young Joon
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Choi, Yun Ha
    Ko, Jum Suk
    Lee, Min Goo
    Kang, Won Yu
    Lee, Shin Eun
    Kim, Soo Hyun
    Sim, Doo Sun
    Park, Keun Ho
    Yoon, Nam Sik
    Youn, Hyun Ju
    Kim, Kye Hun
    Park, Hyung Wook
    Kim, Ju Han
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Cho, Jeong Gwan
    Park, Jong Chun
    Kang, Jung Chaee
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A99 - A99
  • [8] Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon in the patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention
    Oikawa, M
    Komatsu, N
    Shiratori, Y
    Kunii, H
    Yamao, H
    Namiuti, S
    Sugi, M
    Yui, M
    Ichihara, T
    Maruyama, Y
    Kyouritsu, I
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 246A - 246A
  • [9] A Prediction Nomogram for No-Reflow in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Lou, Bowen
    Kan, Kejia
    Liu, Hui
    Feng, Rilu
    Zhang, Xinyu
    Yuan, Zuyi
    Zhang, Lan
    She, Jianqing
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (05)
  • [10] Predictor of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Hong, Y. J.
    Jeong, M. H.
    Ahn, Y. X.
    Kim, J. H.
    Sim, D. S.
    Yoon, N. S.
    Kang, J. C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 101 (8B): : 26C - 27C