Accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer

被引:111
作者
Kitajima, Kazuhiro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Murakami, Koji [2 ]
Yamasaki, Erena [2 ]
Kaji, Yasushi [1 ]
Sugimura, Kazuro [3 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
[2] Dokkyo Med Univ Hosp, PET Ctr, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan
[3] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Kobe, Hyogo 657, Japan
关键词
Uterine cancer; Lymph node metastasis; FDG; PET/CT; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP; CERVICAL-CANCER; ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROGNOSTIC VARIABLES; CORPUS CANCER; STAGE-IB; PET/CT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-008-1271-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose is to evaluate the accuracy of integrated (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography ((CT) with intravenous contrast medium in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer, with surgical and histopathological findings used as the reference standard. Forty-five patients with endometrial or uterine cervical cancer underwent radical hysterectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without paraaortic lymphadenectomy, after PET/CT. PET/CT findings were interpreted by two experienced radiologists in consensus. The criterion for malignancy on PET/CT images was increased tracer uptake by the lymph node, independent of node size. The overall node-based sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases were 51.1% (23/45), 99.8% (1,927/1,931), 85.2% (23/27), 98.9% (1,927/1,949) and 98.7% (1,950/1,976), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting metastatic lesions 4 mm or less in short-axis diameter was 12.5% (2/16), that for between 5 and 9 mm was 66.7% (16/24), and that for 10 mm or larger was 100.0% (5/5). The overall patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value ((PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 50% (6/12), 90.9% (30/33), 66.7% (6/9), 83.3% (30/36) and 80.0% (36/45), respectively. Integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT is superior to conventional imaging, but only moderately sensitive in predicting lymph node metastasis preoperatively in patients with uterine cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1529 / 1536
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer [J].
Harisinghani, MG ;
Barentsz, J ;
Hahn, PF ;
Deserno, WM ;
Tabatabaei, S ;
van de Kaa, CH ;
de la Rosette, J ;
Weissleder, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (25) :2491-U5
[12]   Staging of invasive cervical carcinoma and of pelvic lymph nodes by high resolution MRI with a phased-array coil in comparison with pathological findings [J].
Hawighorst, H ;
Schoenberg, SO ;
Knapstein, PG ;
Knopp, MV ;
Schaeffer, U ;
Essig, M ;
van Kaick, G .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (01) :75-81
[13]   MR-IMAGING EVALUATION OF ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA - RESULTS OF AN NCI COOPERATIVE STUDY [J].
HRICAK, H ;
RUBINSTEIN, LV ;
GHERMAN, GM ;
KARSTAEDT, N .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (03) :829-832
[14]  
INOUE T, 1990, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V65, P1923, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900501)65:9<1923::AID-CNCR2820650909>3.0.CO
[15]  
2-M
[16]   The standardized uptake value for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival [J].
Kidd, Elizabeth A. ;
Siegel, Barry A. ;
Dehdashti, Farrokh ;
Grigsby, Perry W. .
CANCER, 2007, 110 (08) :1738-1744
[17]   UTERINE CERVICAL-CARCINOMA - EVALUATION OF PELVIC LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS WITH MR-IMAGING [J].
KIM, SH ;
KIM, SC ;
CHOI, BI ;
HAN, MC .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (03) :807-811
[18]   Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and Paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer [J].
Kitajima, Kazuhiro ;
Murakami, Koji ;
Yamasaki, Erena ;
Fukasawa, Ichio ;
Inaba, Noriyuki ;
Kaji, Yasushi ;
Sugimura, Kazuro .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (06) :1652-1658
[19]   Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients [J].
Kostakoglu, L ;
Agress, H ;
Goldsmith, SJ .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2003, 23 (02) :315-340
[20]  
Lai CH, 1999, CANCER, V85, P1537, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990401)85:7<1537::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO