Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice

被引：33

作者：

Calderon, Caterina ^{[1
]}

Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula ^{[2
]}

Joan Ferrando, Pere ^{[3
]}

Jara, Carlos ^{[4
]}

Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano ^{[3
]}

Beato, Carmen ^{[5
]}

Garcia-Garcia, Teresa ^{[6
]}

Castelo, Beatriz ^{[7
]}

Ramchandani, Avinash ^{[8
]}

Mar Munoz, Maria ^{[9
]}

Martinez de Castro, Eva ^{[10
]}

Ghanem, Ismael ^{[7
]}

Mangas, Montse ^{[11
]}

Carmona-Bayonas, Alberto ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychobiol, Fac Psychol, Passeig Vall dHebron 171, Barcelona 08035, Spain

[2] Hosp Univ Cent Asturias, Dept Med Oncol, Oviedo, Spain

[3] Rovira & Virgili Univ, Fac Psychol, Tarragona, Spain

[4] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Hosp Univ Fdn Alcorcon, Dept Med Oncol, Madrid, Spain

[5] Hosp Grp Quiron, Dept Med Oncol, Seville, Spain

[6] Hosp Univ Morales Meseguer, Dept Med Oncol, Murcia, Spain

[7] Hosp Univ La Paz, Dept Med Oncol, Madrid, Spain

[8] Hosp Univ Insular Gran Canaria, Dept Med Oncol, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain

[9] Hosp Virgen de La Luz, Dept Med Oncol, Cuenca, Spain

[10] Hosp Univ Marques de Valdecilla, Dept Med Oncol, Santander, Spain

[11] Hosp Galdakao Usansolo, Dept Med Oncol, Galdakao Usansolo, Spain

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY | 2018年 / 18卷 / 02期

关键词：

Cancer; Patient perspective; Patient-physician relationship; Shared decision-making; Instrumentat study; PATIENT; CANCER; PREFERENCES; VALIDATION; PHYSICIANS; CARE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.12.001

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

Background/Objective: This study sought to assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in patients with resected, non-metastatic cancer and eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy. Method: A total of 568 patients were recruited from a multi-institutional, prospective, transversal study. Patients answered the SDM-Q-9 after visiting their medical oncologist who, in turn, completed the SDM-Q-Physician version. Reliability, factorial structures [exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)], and convergent validity of the SDM-Q-9 scores were explored. Results: SDM-Q-9 showed a clear factorial structure, compatible with a strong and replicable general factor and a secondary group factor, in patients with resected, non-metastatic cancer. Total sum scores derived from the general factor showed good reliability in terms of omega coefficient:.90. The association between patient and physician perception of SDM was weak and failed to reach statistical significance. Males and patients over 60 years of age displayed the greatest satisfaction with SDM. Conclusions: SDM-Q-9 can aid in evaluating SDM from the cancer patients' perspective. SDM-Q-9 is helpful in studies examining patient perspectives of SDM and as an indicator of the degree of quality and satisfaction with health care and patient-physician relationship. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. on behalf of Asociacion Espanola de Psicologia Conductual.

引用

页码：143 / 151

页数：9

共 30 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2011, Making shared decision-making a reality: no decision about me, without me

[2] Validation of SDM-Q-Doc Questionnaire to measure shared decision-making physician's perspective in oncology practice [J].

Calderon, C. ;

Ferrando, P. J. ;

Carmona-Bayonas, A. ;

Lorenzo-Seva, U. ;

Jara, C. ;

Beato, C. ;

Garcia, T. ;

Ramchandani, A. ;

Castelo, B. ;

Munoz, M. M. ;

Garcia, S. ;

Higuera, O. ;

Mangas-Izquierdo, M. ;

Jimenez-Fonseca, P. .

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 (11) :1312-1319

[3]

Carretero-Dios H, 2005, INT J CLIN HLTH PSYC, V5, P521

[4] Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review [J].

Chewning, Betty ;

Bylund, Carma L. ;

Shah, Bupendra ;

Arora, Neeraj K. ;

Gueguen, Jennifer A. ;

Makoul, Gregory .

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 86 (01) :9-18

[5] Psychological treatments to improve quality of life in cancer contexts: A meta-analysis [J].

de la Torre-Luque, Alejandro ;

Gambara, Hilda ;

Lopez, Escarlata ;

Antonio Cruzado, Juan .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 16 (02) :211-219

[6] Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire [J].

De las Cuevas, Carlos ;

Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth ;

Rivero-Santana, Amado ;

Cebolla-Marti, Ausias ;

Scholl, Isabelle ;

Haerter, Martin .

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) :2143-2153

[7] Shared Decision Making and Motivational Interviewing: Achieving Patient-Centered Care Across the Spectrum of Health Care Problems [J].

Elwyn, Glyn ;

Dehlendorf, Christine ;

Epstein, Ronald M. ;

Marrin, Katy ;

White, James ;

Frosch, Dominick L. .

ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 12 (03) :270-275

[8]

Ferrando P.J., 2013, Unrestricted item factor analysis and some relations with item response theory

[9] Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis [J].

Ferrando, Pere J. ;

Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano .

EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2018, 78 (05) :762-780

[10] The cost and burden of cancer in the European Union 1995-2014 [J].

Jonsson, Bengt ;

Hofmarcher, Thomas ;

Lindgren, Peter ;

Wilking, Nils .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 66 :162-170

← 1 2 3 →