Performance comparison of 2-methylfuran and gasoline on a spark-ignition engine with cooled exhaust gas recirculation

被引:30
作者
Pan, Mingzhang [1 ]
Shu, Gequn [1 ]
Pan, Jiaying [1 ]
Wei, Haiqiao [1 ]
Feng, Dengquan [1 ]
Guo, Yubin [1 ]
Liang, Youcai [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Engines, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金;
关键词
2-Methylfuran; Exhaust gas recirculation; Compression ratio; Biofuel; LAMINAR BURNING VELOCITIES; 2,5-DIMETHYLFURAN; COMBUSTION; BIOMASS; FUELS; EMISSIONS; ETHANOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.054
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In the present study, the impact of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rates, from 0% to 15%, and compression ratio (CR) of 8, 9, and 10 on the combustion characteristics and emission performance of 2-methylfuran (MF) and gasoline were studied. Experiments were carried out on a Ricardo E6 single-cylinder sparkignition (SI) research engine, under stoichiometric conditions, MF could produce higher cylinder pressure, knocking intensity, combustion temperature, and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions than gasoline at higher CRs. However, an appropriate level of cool EGR improved the combustion and emissions, particularly through knock suppression and reduced NOx emissions. When the cooled EGR rate reached 15%, the NOx emissions from the gasoline at a compression ratio of 10 was reduced by about 20.6 g/kW h (> 72.5%) compared with 0% EGR. With a low EGR rate, there was only a slight improvement in the indicated thermal efficiency; however, when the EGR reaches 15%, the MF results in 31.2% higher indicated thermal efficiency when compared to gasoline with a CR of 10. This work further advances the knowledge of how to improve the overall performance of MF as an alternative fuel for internal combustion engines. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]  
Gatowski J, 1984, 841359 SAE
[12]   Emission characteristics of a spark-ignition engine fuelled with gasoline-n-butanol blends in combination with EGR [J].
Gu, Xiaolei ;
Huang, Zuohua ;
Cai, Jian ;
Gong, Jing ;
Wu, Xuesong ;
Lee, Chia-fon .
FUEL, 2012, 93 (01) :611-617
[13]  
Heywood JB., 2018, INTERNAL COMBUSTION
[14]   Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: Chemistry, catalysts, and engineering [J].
Huber, George W. ;
Iborra, Sara ;
Corma, Avelino .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2006, 106 (09) :4044-4098
[15]   Biofuels: a technological perspective [J].
Luque, Rafael ;
Herrero-Davila, Lorenzo ;
Campelo, Juan M. ;
Clark, James H. ;
Hidalgo, Jose M. ;
Luna, Diego ;
Marinas, Jose M. ;
Romero, Antonio A. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2008, 1 (05) :542-564
[16]  
Ohtomo M, 2011, 011989 SAE
[17]   Effects of EGR on performance of engines with spark gap projection and fueled by biogas-hydrogen blends [J].
Park, Cheolwoong ;
Park, Seunghyun ;
Kim, Changgi ;
Lee, Sunyoup .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (19) :14640-14648
[18]  
Román-Leshkov Y, 2007, NATURE, V447, P982, DOI 10.1038/nature05923
[19]   Study of the knocking propensity of 2,5-dimethylfuran-gasoline and ethanol-gasoline blends [J].
Rothamer, David A. ;
Jennings, Jamie H. .
FUEL, 2012, 98 :203-212
[20]   Catalytic Conversion of Renewable Biomass Resources to Fuels and Chemicals [J].
Serrano-Ruiz, Juan Carlos ;
West, Ryan M. ;
Durnesic, James A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CHEMICAL AND BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING, VOL 1, 2010, 1 :79-100