The Effect of False-Positive Results on Subsequent Participation in Chest X-ray Screening for Lung Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Sato, Akira [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hamada, Shota [1 ]
Urashima, Yuki [2 ]
Tanaka, Shiro [1 ]
Okamoto, Hiroaki [3 ]
Kawakami, Koji [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Pharmacoepidemiol, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hosp, Ctr Canc, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
screening; false positives; lung cancer; adherence; chest X-ray; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; JAPAN; PREFECTURE; POPULATION; MORTALITY; PROGRAM; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.2188/jea.JE20150106
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: High attendance rates and regular participation in disease screening programs are important contributors to program effectiveness. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of an initial false-positive result in chest X-ray screening for lung cancer on subsequent screening participation. Methods: This historical cohort study analyzed individuals who first participated in a lung cancer screening program conducted by Yokohama City between April 2007 and March 2011, and these participants were retrospectively tracked until March 2013. Subsequent screening participation was compared between participants with false-positive results and those with negative results in evaluation periods between 365 (for the primary outcome) and 730 days. The association of screening results with subsequent participation was evaluated using a generalized linear regression model, with adjustment for characteristics of patients and screening. Results: The proportions of subsequent screening participation within 365 days were 12.9% in 3132 participants with false-positive results and 6.7% in 15 737 participants with negative results. Although the differences in attendance rates were reduced with longer cutoffs, participants with false-positive results were consistently more likely to attend subsequent screening than patients with negative results (P < 0.01). The predictors of subsequent screening participation were false-positive results (risk ratio [RR] 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-1.92), older age (RR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.23), male sex (RR 1.46; 95% CI, 1.29-1.64), being a current smoker (RR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93), current employment (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90), and being screened at a hospital cancer center (vs public health centers; RR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15-1.60). Conclusions: Our findings indicated that subsequent participation in lung cancer screening was more likely among participants with false-positive results in an initial screening than patients with negative results.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 653
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study
    Bradley, Stephen H.
    Bhartia, Bobby Sk
    Callister, Matthew Ej
    Hamilton, William T.
    Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
    Kennedy, Martyn Pt
    Mounce, Luke Ta
    Shinkins, Bethany
    Wheatstone, Pete
    Neal, Richard D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 71 (712) : E862 - E868
  • [32] Dimensionality Reduction in Deep Learning for Chest X-Ray Analysis of Lung Cancer
    Gang, Peng
    Zhen, Wang
    Zeng, Wei
    Gordienko, Yuri
    Kochura, Yuriy
    Alienin, Oleg
    Rokovyi, Oleksandr
    Stirenko, Sergii
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (ICACI), 2018, : 878 - 883
  • [33] A CAD System for Lung Cancer Detection Using Chest X-ray: A Review
    Elgohary, Kareem
    Ibrahim, Samar
    Selim, Sahar
    Elattar, Mustafa
    ADVANCES IN MODEL AND DATA ENGINEERING IN THE DIGITALIZATION ERA, MEDI 2022, 2022, 1751 : 12 - 25
  • [34] Chest X-ray features extraction for lung cancer classification
    Patil, S. A.
    Udupi, V. R.
    JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, 2010, 69 (04): : 271 - 277
  • [35] Impact of intermediate mammography assessment on the likelihood of false-positive results in breast cancer screening programmes
    Nieves Ascunce
    María Ederra
    Josu Delfrade
    Araceli Baroja
    Nieves Erdozain
    Raquel Zubizarreta
    Dolores Salas
    Xavier Castells
    European Radiology, 2012, 22 : 331 - 340
  • [36] Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening Comparing Computed Tomography (CT) to Chest X-Ray (CXR) to No Screening in PLCO and NLST Randomized Trials
    Flores, John Paul E.
    Moreno-Koehler, Alejandro
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Caro, Jaime
    Strauss, Gary
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (09) : S733 - S733
  • [37] Effect of false-positive screening mammograms on rescreening in Western Australia
    Sim, Marcus J. H.
    Siva, Siva Prema
    Ramli, Intan S.
    Fritschi, Lin
    Tresham, Janette
    Wylie, Elizabeth J.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2012, 196 (11) : 693 - 695
  • [38] Impact of intermediate mammography assessment on the likelihood of false-positive results in breast cancer screening programmes
    Ascunce, Nieves
    Ederra, Maria
    Delfrade, Josu
    Baroja, Araceli
    Erdozain, Nieves
    Zubizarreta, Raquel
    Salas, Dolores
    Castells, Xavier
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (02) : 331 - 340
  • [39] CHEST X-RAY (CXR) SCREENING FOR LUNG CANCER: OVERDIAGNOSIS, ENDPOINTS, AND RANDOMIZED POPULATION TRIALS (RPTS)
    Strauss, Gary M.
    Dominioni, Lorenzo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 : S1277 - S1277
  • [40] Obstetric, Perinatal, and Fetal Outcomes in Pregnancies With False-Positive Integrated Screening Results
    Baer, Rebecca J.
    Currier, Robert J.
    Norton, Mary E.
    Flessel, Monica C.
    Goldman, Sara
    Towner, Dena
    Jelliffe-Pawlowski, Laura L.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (03) : 603 - 609