The Effect of False-Positive Results on Subsequent Participation in Chest X-ray Screening for Lung Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Sato, Akira [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hamada, Shota [1 ]
Urashima, Yuki [2 ]
Tanaka, Shiro [1 ]
Okamoto, Hiroaki [3 ]
Kawakami, Koji [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Pharmacoepidemiol, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hosp, Ctr Canc, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
screening; false positives; lung cancer; adherence; chest X-ray; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; JAPAN; PREFECTURE; POPULATION; MORTALITY; PROGRAM; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.2188/jea.JE20150106
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: High attendance rates and regular participation in disease screening programs are important contributors to program effectiveness. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of an initial false-positive result in chest X-ray screening for lung cancer on subsequent screening participation. Methods: This historical cohort study analyzed individuals who first participated in a lung cancer screening program conducted by Yokohama City between April 2007 and March 2011, and these participants were retrospectively tracked until March 2013. Subsequent screening participation was compared between participants with false-positive results and those with negative results in evaluation periods between 365 (for the primary outcome) and 730 days. The association of screening results with subsequent participation was evaluated using a generalized linear regression model, with adjustment for characteristics of patients and screening. Results: The proportions of subsequent screening participation within 365 days were 12.9% in 3132 participants with false-positive results and 6.7% in 15 737 participants with negative results. Although the differences in attendance rates were reduced with longer cutoffs, participants with false-positive results were consistently more likely to attend subsequent screening than patients with negative results (P < 0.01). The predictors of subsequent screening participation were false-positive results (risk ratio [RR] 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-1.92), older age (RR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.23), male sex (RR 1.46; 95% CI, 1.29-1.64), being a current smoker (RR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93), current employment (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90), and being screened at a hospital cancer center (vs public health centers; RR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15-1.60). Conclusions: Our findings indicated that subsequent participation in lung cancer screening was more likely among participants with false-positive results in an initial screening than patients with negative results.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 653
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer
    Gohagan, JK
    Marcus, PM
    Fagerstrom, RM
    Pinsky, PF
    Kramer, BS
    Prorok, PC
    Ascher, S
    Bailey, W
    Brewer, B
    Church, T
    Engelhard, D
    Ford, M
    Fouad, M
    Freedman, M
    Gelmann, E
    Gierada, D
    Hocking, W
    Inampudi, S
    Irons, B
    Johnson, CC
    Jones, A
    Kucera, G
    Kvale, P
    Lappe, K
    Manor, W
    Moore, A
    Nath, H
    Neff, S
    Oken, M
    Plunkett, M
    Price, H
    Reding, D
    Riley, T
    Schwartz, M
    Spizarny, D
    Yoffie, R
    Zylak, C
    LUNG CANCER, 2005, 47 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [2] A model of the influence of false-positive mammography screening results on subsequent screening
    DeFrank, Jessica T.
    Brewer, Noel
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 4 (02) : 112 - 127
  • [3] Assessing the performance of chest x-ray screening in detecting early-stage lung cancer in the general population
    Chei, Choy-Lye
    Nakamura, Sho
    Watanabe, Kaname
    Mizutani, Takashi
    Narimatsu, Hiroto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, : 2127 - 2139
  • [4] Could chest X-ray screening for lung cancer be cost-effective?
    Caro, JJ
    Klittich, WS
    Strauss, G
    CANCER, 2000, 89 (11) : 2502 - 2505
  • [5] Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography
    Pinckney, RG
    Geller, BM
    Burman, M
    Littenberg, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 114 (02) : 120 - 125
  • [6] Cumulative Incidence of False-Positive Results in Repeated, Multimodal Cancer Screening
    Croswell, Jennifer Miller
    Kramer, Barnett S.
    Kreimer, Aimee R.
    Prorok, Phil C.
    Xu, Jian-Lun
    Baker, Stuart G.
    Fagerstrom, Richard
    Riley, Thomas L.
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Gohagan, John K.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Chia, David
    Church, Timothy R.
    Crawford, E. David
    Fouad, Mona N.
    Gelmann, Edward P.
    Lamerato, Lois
    Reding, Douglas J.
    Schoen, Robert E.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 7 (03) : 212 - 222
  • [7] Effect of false-positive results on reattendance at breast cancer screening programmes in Spain
    Alamo-Junquera, Dolores
    Murta-Nascimento, Cristiane
    Macia, Francesc
    Bare, Marisa
    Galceran, Jaume
    Ascunce, Nieves
    Zubizarreta, Raquel
    Salas, Dolores
    Roman, Ruben
    Castells, Xavier
    Sala, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 22 (03) : 404 - 408
  • [8] False-positive screening results in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial
    Kilpelainen, T. P.
    Tammela, T. L. J.
    Maattanen, L.
    Kujala, P.
    Stenman, U-H
    Ala-Opas, M.
    Murtola, T. J.
    Auvinen, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 102 (03) : 469 - 474
  • [9] Effectiveness of Lung-RADS in Reducing False-Positive Results in a Diverse, Underserved, Urban Lung Cancer Screening Cohort
    Kaminetzky, Mark
    Milch, Hannah S.
    Shmukler, Anna
    Kessler, Abraham
    Peng, Robert
    Mardakhaev, Edward
    Bellin, Eran Y.
    Levsky, Jeffrey M.
    Haramati, Linda B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (04) : 419 - 426
  • [10] False-Positive Results in Pregnancy Screening for Aneuploidy
    Sahhaf, Farnaz
    Alimohammadi, Arezoo
    Mosavi, Sanaz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH AND REPRODUCTION SCIENCES, 2020, 8 (04): : 418 - 422