Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs

被引:155
作者
Gacsi, Marta [1 ]
McGreevy, Paul [2 ]
Kara, Edina [1 ]
Adam Miklosi [1 ]
机构
[1] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Dept Ethol, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Vet Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
WOLVES;
D O I
10.1186/1744-9081-5-31
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: It has been suggested that the functional similarities in the socio-cognitive behaviour of dogs and humans emerged as a consequence of comparable environmental selection pressures. Here we use a novel approach to account for the facilitating effect of domestication in dogs and reveal that selection for two factors under genetic influence (visual cooperation and focused attention) may have led independently to increased comprehension of human communicational cues. Method: In Study 1, we observed the performance of three groups of dogs in utilizing the human pointing gesture in a two-way object choice test. We compared breeds selected to work while visually separated from human partners (N = 30, 21 breeds, clustered as independent worker group), with those selected to work in close cooperation and continuous visual contact with human partners (N = 30, 22 breeds, clustered as cooperative worker group), and with a group of mongrels (N = 30). Secondly, it has been reported that, in dogs, selective breeding to produce an abnormal shortening of the skull is associated with a more pronounced area centralis (location of greatest visual acuity). In Study 2, breeds with high cephalic index and more frontally placed eyes (brachycephalic breeds, N = 25, 14 breeds) were compared with breeds with low cephalic index and laterally placed eyes (dolichocephalic breeds, N = 25, 14 breeds). Results: In Study 1, cooperative workers were significantly more successful in utilizing the human pointing gesture than both the independent workers and the mongrels. In study 2, we found that brachycephalic dogs performed significantly better than dolichocephalic breeds. Discussion: After controlling for environmental factors, we have provided evidence that at least two independent phenotypic traits with certain genetic variability affect the ability of dogs to rely on human visual cues. This finding should caution researchers against making simple generalizations about the effects of domestication and on dog-wolf differences in the utilization of human visual signals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
FONDON JW, 2004, PNAS, V28, P18058
[2]  
FRANK H, 1980, Z TIERPSYCHOL, V53, P389
[3]   Species-specific differences and similarities in the behavior of hand-raised dog and wolf pups in social situations with humans [J].
Gácsi, M ;
Gyori, B ;
Miklósi, A ;
Virányi, Z ;
Kubinyi, E ;
Topál, J ;
Csányi, V .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2005, 47 (02) :111-122
[4]  
GACSI M, 2009, CANIS FAMILIARIS, V12, P471
[5]  
Gacsi M., 2009, J VET BEHAV, V4, P58
[6]   Human-like social skills in dogs? [J].
Hare, B ;
Tomasello, M .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (09) :439-444
[7]   Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of experiments on primate social cognition? [J].
Hare B. .
Animal Cognition, 2001, 4 (3-4) :269-280
[8]   The domestication of social cognition in dogs [J].
Hare, B ;
Brown, M ;
Williamson, C ;
Tomasello, M .
SCIENCE, 2002, 298 (5598) :1634-1636
[9]   Single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based association mapping of dog stereotypes [J].
Jones, Paul ;
Chase, Kevin ;
Martin, Alan ;
Davern, Pluis ;
Ostrander, Elaine A. ;
Lark, Karl G. .
GENETICS, 2008, 179 (02) :1033-1044
[10]  
Lorenz K., 1981, The Foundations of Ethology