Five Organizational Features That Enable Successful Interdisciplinary Marine Research

被引:40
作者
Blythe, Jessica [1 ]
Cvitanovic, Christopher [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, Environm Sustainabil Res Ctr, St Catharines, ON, Canada
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Austnalian Natl Ctr Publ Awareness Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
interdisciplinary research; anthropocene; sustainability; interdisciplinary institutions; institutional capacity; Australia; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE; GENDER DIVERSITY; POLICY; IMPACT; ADAPTATION; INTERFACE; ANTHROPOCENE; SCIENTISTS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2020.539111
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To generate innovative solutions for marine sustainability challenges, scientists, policymakers, and funders are increasingly calling for interdisciplinary research that transcends disciplinary boundaries. However, challenges associated with doing interdisciplinary research persist and undermine progress toward tackling the complex challenges faced by marine social-ecological systems. One barrier for engaging in effective interdisciplinary research is a lack of understanding about the institutional capacities that support interdisciplinary knowledge production. Based on in-depth qualitative interviews with members of the Centre for Marine Socioecology in Australia, we identify five principles that underpin effective interdisciplinary research organizations. The principles are: (1) support female leadership; (2) forge partnerships outside of academia; (3) develop impact-based performance metrics; (4) focus on long-term funding; and (5) cultivate a visible brand. Going forward, these principles could be used to inform organizational design that transforms institutional barriers into enablers of innovative interdisciplinary research for more sustainable, desirable, and equitable futures.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   Progress in integrating natural and social science in marine ecosystem-based management research [J].
Alexander, K. A. ;
Hobday, A. J. ;
Cvitanovic, C. ;
Ogier, E. ;
Nash, K. L. ;
Cottrell, R. S. ;
Fleming, A. ;
Fudge, M. ;
Fulton, E. A. ;
Frusher, S. ;
Kelly, R. ;
MacLeod, C. K. ;
Pecl, G. T. ;
van Putten, I. ;
Vince, J. ;
Watson, R. A. .
MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2019, 70 (01) :71-83
[2]   Supporting early career researchers: insights from interdisciplinary marine scientists [J].
Andrews, Evan J. ;
Harper, Sarah ;
Cashion, Tim ;
Palacios-Abrantes, Juliano ;
Blythe, Jessica ;
Daly, Jack ;
Eger, Sondra ;
Hoover, Carie ;
Talloni-Alvarez, Nicolas ;
Teh, Louise ;
Bennett, Nathan ;
Epstein, Graham ;
Knott, Christine ;
Newell, Sarah L. ;
Whitney, Charlotte K. .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2020, 77 (02) :476-485
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Res. All, DOI DOI 10.18546/RFA.02.1.13
[4]   The Impact of Gender Composition on Team Performance and Decision Making: Evidence from the Field [J].
Apesteguia, Jose ;
Azmat, Ghazala ;
Iriberri, Nagore .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2012, 58 (01) :78-93
[5]   Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda [J].
Bai, Xuemei ;
van der Leeuw, Sander ;
O'Brien, Karen ;
Berkhout, Frans ;
Biermann, Frank ;
Brondizio, Eduardo S. ;
Cudennec, Christophe ;
Dearing, John ;
Duraiappah, Anantha ;
Glaser, Marion ;
Revkin, Andrew ;
Steffen, Will ;
Syvitski, James .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2016, 39 :351-362
[6]  
Baker S.E., 2012, NATL CTR RES METHODS
[7]   Should we discipline interdisciplinarity? [J].
Bammer G. .
Palgrave Communications, 3 (1)
[8]   Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface: the practitioners' perspectives [J].
Bednarek, A. T. ;
Wyborn, C. ;
Cvitanovic, C. ;
Meyer, R. ;
Colvin, R. M. ;
Addison, P. F. E. ;
Close, S. L. ;
Curran, K. ;
Farooque, M. ;
Goldman, E. ;
Hart, D. ;
Mannix, H. ;
McGreavy, B. ;
Parris, A. ;
Posner, S. ;
Robinson, C. ;
Ryan, M. ;
Leith, P. .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (04) :1175-1183
[9]   Science-policy intermediaries from a practitioner's perspective: The Lenfest Ocean Program experience [J].
Bednarek, Angela T. ;
Shouse, Ben ;
Hudson, Charlotte G. ;
Goldburg, Rebecca .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2016, 43 (02) :291-300
[10]   Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context [J].
Belcher, Brian M. ;
Rasmussen, Katherine E. ;
Kemshaw, Matthew R. ;
Zornes, Deborah A. .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2016, 25 (01) :1-17